W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > July to September 2002

RE: error condition for delete of VHR when VCR is in checked-in c ollection

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:28:59 +0200
To: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>, <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCOENPEOAA.julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>

> From: ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org
> [mailto:ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Clemm, Geoff
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 2:05 PM
> To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
> Subject: RE: error condition for delete of VHR when VCR is in checked-in
> c ollection
> 
> ..
>    In case b), there's no way a subsequent CHECKIN or CHECKOUT can
>    satisfy RFC3253's postconditions, so I'd consider this a broken
>    state. There shouldn't be a protocol-tolerated way to get into this
>    state, right?
> 
> Which CHECKOUT/CHECKIN postconditions couldn't be satisfied?
> I do agree that some operations could not succeed (e.g. UNCHECKOUT).

You are right. CHECKIN/CHECKOUT would continue to work.
Received on Thursday, 11 July 2002 03:29:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 13:57:43 GMT