W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > January to March 2002

RE: version-tree report vs Version History Resources

From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 12:37:43 -0500
Message-ID: <3906C56A7BD1F54593344C05BD1374B103F8B038@SUS-MA1IT01>
To: "Ietf-Dav-Versioning@W3. Org" <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
No, the VHR is not required to support the DAV:version-tree report.
A server could allow it, but this would be a non-standard extension.
(Note that the DAV:version-tree report is just a restricted form of
the DAV:expand-property report, and is redundant if a server supports
version history resources).


-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@greenbytes.de]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 12:21 PM
To: Ietf-Dav-Versioning@W3. Org
Subject: DAV:version-tree report vs Version History Resources


is a VHR supposed to support the DAV:version-tree report? Section 3.7 is
silent on this...

Received on Monday, 11 March 2002 12:38:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:48 UTC