- From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 12:37:43 -0500
- To: "Ietf-Dav-Versioning@W3. Org" <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
No, the VHR is not required to support the DAV:version-tree report. A server could allow it, but this would be a non-standard extension. (Note that the DAV:version-tree report is just a restricted form of the DAV:expand-property report, and is redundant if a server supports version history resources). Cheers, Geoff -----Original Message----- From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@greenbytes.de] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 12:21 PM To: Ietf-Dav-Versioning@W3. Org Subject: DAV:version-tree report vs Version History Resources Hi, is a VHR supposed to support the DAV:version-tree report? Section 3.7 is silent on this... Julian
Received on Monday, 11 March 2002 12:38:20 UTC