> From: ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org > [mailto:ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Clemm, Geoff > Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 9:49 PM > To: Ietf-Dav-Versioning@W3. Org > Subject: RE: locate-by-history report vs. Depth header > > > Actually, the report clearly makes the most sense for depth=0 (perhaps > that's what you > meant to type?). You managed to confuse me :-) It the request URI is the parent collection, and the scope is the member of this collection, only depth = 1 seems to make sense. Depth 0's scope would be just the parent collection, correct?Received on Thursday, 7 March 2002 17:42:44 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 13:57:43 GMT