W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > January to March 2002

RE: VERSION-CONTROL in an activity

From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 23:14:33 -0500
Message-ID: <3906C56A7BD1F54593344C05BD1374B1060EE2F0@SUS-MA1IT01>
To: "Ietf-Dav-Versioning@W3. Org" <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
That is correct.  It probably would be very reasonable to define
both of these behaviors as being required in the next rev of the


-----Original Message-----
From: Roy Seto [mailto:Roy.Seto@oracle.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 6:46 PM
To: Ietf-Dav-Versioning@W3. Org
Subject: VERSION-CONTROL in an activity

Suppose I wanted to capture that adding a resource to version control was
part of an activity. 

It seems to me that this could be reflected by making the VERSION-CONTROL
method create a VCR whose DAV:checked-in version included that activity in
its DAV:activity-set property value. It looks like the spec allows but does
not require servers to do this (for example) if the VERSION-CONTROL request
includes a DAV:activity-set element, or if the request-URL for
VERSION-CONTROL is the member of a workspace with a nonempty
DAV:current-activity-set property value.

Is this interpretation correct?

Received on Wednesday, 6 March 2002 23:15:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:48 UTC