W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > April to June 2002

RE: Label header vs PROPFIND depth 1

From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 10:53:45 -0400
Message-ID: <3906C56A7BD1F54593344C05BD1374B103F8B15C@SUS-MA1IT01>
To: "'Deltav WG'" <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
I am not surprised the Label header is proving to be problematic.
The last time I tried to get rid of it (obviously unsuccessfully)
was about a year ago.

My first choice would be to deprecate the Label header altogether, and
to instead define a DAV:labeled-version report on a VCR, whose
parameters were a label and a list of property names.  The result of
this report would be the values of the specified properties on the
version selected by the specified label from the VCR identified by the

An alternative approach would be to deprecate the use of the Label
header with a non-zero Depth request (either because of an explicit
non-zero Depth header, or because a request is non-zero Depth by

I'd be interested in responses on the following three questions:

(1) Do these approaches address the issues raised?
(2) Is there another approach that could be considered?
(3) Which approach do you prefer?

If we can get consensus on an approach, I'll add it to the RFC 3253
Errata document.

Received on Friday, 26 April 2002 10:54:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:48 UTC