W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > October to December 2001

RE: baselines & namespaces

From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 08:48:33 -0500
Message-ID: <3906C56A7BD1F54593344C05BD1374B1052ADED8@SUS-MA1IT01>
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
   From: Alison Macmillan [mailto:alison.macmillan@oracle.com]

   "Clemm, Geoff" wrote:

   >    From: Alison Macmillan [mailto:alison.macmillan@oracle.com]
   >    I hadn't understood from the spec that the (collection)
   >    version-history should imply a baseline, and so had not seen
   >    how the version-controlled-binding could behave as a
   >    "baseline-binding".
   > A collection version history definitely does not imply a
   > baseline.  But if a server supports both version-controlled
   > collections and baselines, then if a baseline B1 selects
   > collection version CV2 (say with name "x/y" relative to the root
   > of B1), and if CV2 has a version-controlled binding named "z" to
   > the collection version history CVH3, and if B1 has a subbaseline
   > B2, and if the root of B2 is a version of CVH3, then subbaseline
   > B2 will be located at "x/y/z" relative to the root of B1.

   So, is it right that the DAV:baseline-collection can _itself_ be a
   VCR (for the above example, with DAV:checked-in a version of CVH3)?

That's correct.

Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2001 08:49:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:47 UTC