Re: Proposed Simplifications to the DeltaV protocol

>The fifth (and final) proposed simplification was to define a set of
>four feature "packages", and to state that a versioning server SHOULD
>support at least one of those packages.  This then allows a versioning
>client to look for one of the four defined feature packages, rather
>than worrying about all possible combinations of features.  Note: a
>server still exposes its functionality as a set of features.

Are these "packages" going to be represented as "DAV Compliance Classes"?
For example, classes 3, 4, 5 & 6.

Just curious.  Thanks,
Steve