W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: Submitting DeltaV as Informational RFC? (was: Splitting off core: where we stand)

From: Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 04:39:20 -0800
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Message-ID: <20010209043920.S26044@lyra.org>
Agh... no way. This *is* a standards track document. Nothing less.

On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 11:30:18AM +0100, Juergen Reuter wrote:
> Following the recent discussion about the maturity of DeltaV, I wonder if
> it might be an option to submit DeltaV as an informational RFC.  On the
> one hand, this might satisfy people that want to see some 'official' RFC
> before starting to work on software.  On the other hand, an informational
> RFC is probably much easier to change than a proposed standard RFC, which
> is a standard tracks document.
> Just have a look at the HTTP protocol:  As of May 1996, HTTP was still
> issued as informational RFC (RFC 1945), although there had been HTTP
> server implementations running since 1990, i.e. for about 6 years.  HTTP
> switched to a proposed standard not earlier than in January 1997 (RFC
> 2068).  The bottom line here is, that HTTP became a proposed standard not
> before there were many implementations available revealing all the
> bugs and weaknesses of earlier HTTP protocol versions.  In my opinion,
> WebDAV suffers from this experience; and DeltaV should do it better than
> WebDAV!
> Greetings,
>             Juergen

Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
Received on Friday, 9 February 2001 07:37:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:46 UTC