W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > January to March 2001

RE: Missing preconditions?

From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 00:45:15 -0500
Message-ID: <3906C56A7BD1F54593344C05BD1374B101C2CE91@SUS-MA1IT01>
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
These are covered by the standard 405 (Method not allowed) status.
In addition, for future extensibility, I believe it is better
not to make these explicit preconditions.


-----Original Message-----
From: Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com [mailto:Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 8:01 AM
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Subject: Missing preconditions?

I seem to recall that the document used to have the LABEL and CHECKOUT
precondition DAV:must-be-version-or-version-controlled-resource, and the
VERSION-CONTROL precondition DAV:must-be-versionable.

Why have they been dropped?


Tim Ellison
Java Technology Centre, MP146
IBM UK Laboratory, Hursley Park, Winchester, UK.
tel: +44 (0)1962 819872  internal: 249872  MOBx: 270452
Received on Thursday, 25 January 2001 00:45:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:46 UTC