Re: "working-resource" vs. "client-workspace" option (was: Mail never hit list)

On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 11:36:23AM -0500, Geoffrey M. Clemm wrote:
> 
>    From: "Mark A. Hale" <mark.hale@interwoven.com>
> 
>    Can we transition from using the terms "client-workspace" and
>    "server-workspace" to "working resource" and "workspace" which more
>    appropriately capture the functional meaning of the contents in the
>    specification.
>    ...
> 
> I think this is a reasonable suggestion, and am happy to make this change.
> Does anyone object?

No objections here!

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/

Received on Friday, 12 January 2001 15:04:06 UTC