W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > October to December 2000

RE: Issues, Issues, ???

From: Mark A. Hale <mark.hale@interwoven.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 13:00:01 -0600
To: "DeltaV" <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
Message-ID: <FCEJIPPGHGNPMFLDIMEFOECPCHAA.mark.hale@interwoven.com>

> Currently, I still have some stuff to write up for the revised
> protocol, but the only thing left on my "unresolved issue" list is:
>
> (1) Should version history URL's be in core (i.e. be required)?

No

> (2) Should version URL's be stable (i.e. cannot later refer to
> something else)?

Prefer no (but can live with yes).

I can imagine the simplest server (with a thin client) re-initializing the
versioning of a resource on request and recycling URLs.

	Thanks,

	Mark
Received on Wednesday, 20 December 2000 13:58:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 13:57:39 GMT