W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > October to December 2000

Re: Deletion semantics for versioning metadata

From: <Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 11:30:16 +0000
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Message-ID: <8025699D.003F37E7.00@d06mta07.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>

Is that 'should' a SHOULD or a MUST?

There are likely servers that cannot achieve an 'atomic delete with
multiple resource property updates'.


"Geoffrey M. Clemm" <geoffrey.clemm@rational.com> on 2000-11-19 06:08:03 PM

Please respond to "Geoffrey M. Clemm" <geoffrey.clemm@rational.com>

To:   ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Subject:  Deletion semantics for versioning metadata

Greg has asked that we clarify the results of deleting things
like working resources, versions, version histories, etc.

I believe it is sufficient for us to say that if a server allows you
to delete such a resource, that all the versioning properties of other
resources that refer to that resource should be updated to no longer
refer to the deleted resource (I'd probably enumerate those properties
to make sure there is no misunderstanding).

Any objections?

Received on Monday, 20 November 2000 06:44:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:46 UTC