W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-charsets@w3.org > January to March 2004

RE: Change to charset registry for "ECMA-cyrillic" (updated) (char-set)

From: IANA <iana@iana.org>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 10:24:09 -0800
To: Michael Sokolov <msokolov@ivan.Harhan.ORG>, ietf-charsets@iana.org
Message-id: <EGEJIHIPFJAJHKFBHEMDOEKFCEAA.iana@iana.org>

It is fixed.


-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Sokolov [mailto:msokolov@ivan.Harhan.ORG]
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 10:40 AM
To: iana@iana.org; ietf-charsets@iana.org
Subject: RE: Change to charset registry for "ECMA-cyrillic" (updated)
(char-set)


IANA <iana@iana.org> wrote:

> All,
>
> Please let the IANA know if this
> paragraph should be added to the registry:
>
> NOTE: The description of this charset in RFC 1345 is INCORRECT.  The only
> correct and authoritative description of this charset is the registration
> document in the ISO registry, a scan of which appears at the URL given
> above.

Paul wrote on ietf-charsets:

: I purposely did *not* ask for that in the registry because nothing in
: the new registration indicates anything about RFC 1345. There are
: other know problems with RFC 1345, but it will take quite some time
: to resolve them. Until then, we should not be confusing folks reading
: the registry who haven't read RFC 1345.

I don't have strong feelings either way, I just thought it would be helpful
to
warn people that RFC 1345 is wrong.  I guess other people on ietf-charsets
can
express their opinions.

But have you fixed the typo in the alias name, which should be KOI8-E and
not
KO18-E?

MS
Received on Monday, 9 February 2004 14:23:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Monday, 12 September 2005 15:54:04 GMT