Martin Duerst wrote: > I think I would advocate that we update stringprep/nameprep/idna > immediately to Unicode 4.0 if it were not for the fact that > this technology is just now being introduced. You need not bundle stringprep/nameprep/idna all in one big lump. I think stringprep could very well (and should, IMHO) be updated right now, so that new profiles can use all of 4.0. But I agree that IDNA should not bite the bullet too hastily. -- Fran鏾isReceived on Wednesday, 11 June 2003 10:01:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Monday, 12 September 2005 15:53:32 GMT