> There is no value in registering all the different names that have been > given to this charsets in various publications, unless there is at least > intent but better yet an implementation using this name for MIME content > labeling. Yes, but it can nearly impossible to tell if something has progressed from description to actual use. The Internet is just too large to make these sorts of assessments any more. > The sites you point out do not indicate that the given name is intended to > be directly used as a MIME charset label. I've seen CP1252 and I believe IBM-1252 used in MIME charset fields. NedReceived on Wednesday, 26 January 2000 15:23:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 5 June 2006 15:10:51 GMT