W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-charsets@w3.org > October to December 1999

Re: Fwd: Last Call: UTF-16, an encoding of ISO 10646 to Proposed

From: Ira Mcdonald <imcdonal@sdsp.mc.xerox.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 23:31:38 -0500 (EST)
To: Harald@Alvestrand.no, ietf-charsets@iana.org
Message-id: <199912160431.XAA22463@appsrv2.sdsp.mc.xerox.com>
Hi folks,

I agree with Harald's judgment that Informational and *not*
Proposed Standard is appropriate.  The IETF has done a good
job of updating core IETF protocols to prefer or require
UTF-8.  Over the wire, UTF-16 has a long list of drawbacks
and no visible advantages.  It shouldn't be 'legitimized'
by IETF Proposed Standard designation.

My two cents,
- Ira McDonald
  High North Inc
Received on Thursday, 16 December 1999 00:13:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 5 June 2006 15:10:51 GMT