- From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <Harald@Alvestrand.no>
- Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 17:07:40 +0100
- To: ietf-charsets@iana.org
FYI:
this Last Call seems to be under current IESG discussion.
My personal opinion is that it should have gone Informational.
Harald A
>To: IETF-Announce: ;
>Cc: unicode@unicode.org
>From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
>SUBJECT: Last Call: UTF-16, an encoding of ISO 10646 to Proposed
>Reply-to: iesg@ietf.org
>Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 07:12:18 -0400
>Sender: scoya@cnri.reston.va.us
>
>
>The original Last Call notice was incorrect in that it stated the
>intended status as Informational. This document will be considered
>for Proposed Standard. The Last Call expiration date is unchanged.
>===================================================
>
>The IESG has received a request to consider UTF-16, an encoding of ISO
>10646 <draft-hoffman-utf16-04.txt> as Proposed Standard. This has
>been reviewed in the IETF but is not the product of an IETF Working
>Group.
>
>The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
>final comments on this action. Please send any comments to the
>iesg@ietf.org or ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by September 13, 1999.
>
>Files can be obtained via
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hoffman-utf16-04.txt
--
Harald Tveit Alvestrand, EDB Maxware, Norway
Harald.Alvestrand@edb.maxware.no
Received on Tuesday, 14 December 1999 11:07:25 UTC