- From: MURATA Makoto <murata@apsdc.ksp.fujixerox.co.jp>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 10:13:21 +0900
- To: Dan Kegel <dank@alumni.caltech.edu>
- Cc: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <Harald.Alvestrand@maxware.no>, "Martin J. Duerst" <duerst@w3.org>, unicore@unicode.org, Multiple Recipients of Unicore <unicore@unicode.org>, kenw@sybase.com, ietf-charsets@iana.org
Dan Kegel wrote: > >Making the BOM optional is an upper-compatible change. > > What would the consequences be at this point for XML > if this group tried to mandate a byte order for "UTF-16" > and mandate a BOM for "marked-UTF-16"? The XML WG has to discuss, but I think XML can be revised accordingly. Makoto Fuji Xerox Information Systems Tel: +81-44-812-7230 Fax: +81-44-812-7231 E-mail: murata@apsdc.ksp.fujixerox.co.jp --Boundary (ID uEbHHWxWEwCKT9wM3evJ5w)
Received on Monday, 27 July 1998 18:13:46 UTC