Call for proposals
Masanobu UMEDA (umerin@bisque.mse.kyutech.ac.jp)
Fri, 14 Jun 1996 10:38:52 +0900
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 1996 10:38:52 +0900
From: Masanobu UMEDA <umerin@bisque.mse.kyutech.ac.jp>
Subject: Call for proposals
In-reply-to: "13 Jun 1996 10:26:34 -0400"
To: glenn@spyglass.com
Cc: mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp, Lueko.Willms@t-online.de,
Message-id: <9606140138.AA26913@bisque.mse.kyutech.ac.jp>
--Boundary (ID 3b2ufygT4nUJVN8N4PwBbA)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 1996 10:26:34 -0400
From: Glenn Adams <glenn@spyglass.com>
That's strange. Why is 10646 now a Japanese National Standard (JIS X 0221)
and why is it a Chinese Standard (GB 13000)? Why did *your* national
standard's body accept it is a standard and support its continued development?
The answer to your question is quite simple. Any ISO standard becomes
(almost automatically) a JIS standard principally whether it is
valuable or not. You can find related statements in the following
Japanese document:
--Boundary (ID 3b2ufygT4nUJVN8N4PwBbA)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP
$@9)6HI8=`2=?d?JD94|7W2h$N:vDj$K4X$9$k7z5D(J($@Bh(J7$@<!(J)
($@J?@.(J2$@G/(J6$@7n(J5$@F|(J $@F|K\9)6HI8=`D4::2q(J)
--Boundary (ID 3b2ufygT4nUJVN8N4PwBbA)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
In addition, any JIS standard which is local to Japan cannot be
developed if any ISO standard of which the coverage is almost same but
the methodology is different is once defined or being defined. It was
declared by Mr.Nakasone when he was a prime minister.
--Boundary (ID 3b2ufygT4nUJVN8N4PwBbA)--
--Boundary (ID uEbHHWxWEwCKT9wM3evJ5w)