W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > html-tidy@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: Questions about access.c

From: Arnaud Desitter <arnaud02@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 18:23:08 +0100
Message-ID: <a240ddd00907031023v4f25225oef1fa669ddd4676d@mail.gmail.com>
To: aditsu <aditsu@yahoo.com>
Cc: html-tidy@w3.org
Hi,

You are welcome to report bugs with test cases and to provide patches
in you change your mind though.
"tidy/test" contains the test suite which may be useful to you.

Good luck,

On 03/07/2009, aditsu <aditsu@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, thanks for your answer
>
> Arnaud Desitter-2 wrote:
> >
> > access.c was not part of tidy originally and was originally written
> > seperately.
> >
>
> Oh, I wasn't aware of that. It happened to be the first source file in
> alphabetical order (in the src folder).
>
>
> > There is no real point in fixing the code it if some test cases are
> > not added to the test suite to illustrate why the code change is
> > useful.
> >
>
> You have a point there. Perhaps the author(s) of that code should be
> involved.
> My main focus is updating jtidy (and translating access.c to java was going
> to be part of that), I don't expect to also write patches for tidy (at least
> not before I'm happy with jtidy).
> Since the accessibility code is kinda separate (and can actually be excluded
> from compilation), maybe I should focus on other things first.
>
> Thanks
> Adrian
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Questions-about-access.c-tp24313470p24326229.html
> Sent from the w3.org - html-tidy mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 3 July 2009 17:29:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 April 2012 06:13:59 GMT