W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > html-tidy@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: Questions about access.c

From: aditsu <aditsu@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 10:14:32 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <24326229.post@talk.nabble.com>
To: html-tidy@w3.org

Hi, thanks for your answer

Arnaud Desitter-2 wrote:
> access.c was not part of tidy originally and was originally written
> seperately.

Oh, I wasn't aware of that. It happened to be the first source file in
alphabetical order (in the src folder).

> There is no real point in fixing the code it if some test cases are
> not added to the test suite to illustrate why the code change is
> useful.

You have a point there. Perhaps the author(s) of that code should be
My main focus is updating jtidy (and translating access.c to java was going
to be part of that), I don't expect to also write patches for tidy (at least
not before I'm happy with jtidy).
Since the accessibility code is kinda separate (and can actually be excluded
from compilation), maybe I should focus on other things first.

View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Questions-about-access.c-tp24313470p24326229.html
Sent from the w3.org - html-tidy mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Received on Friday, 3 July 2009 17:15:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:38:57 UTC