W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > html-tidy@w3.org > April to June 2006

Re: Error reading file - 55 MB

From: Devarasetty Ramu <ramuis78@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 10:16:47 -0400
Message-ID: <BAY105-DAV7960879C13382BED4DDEFD19E0@phx.gbl>
To: "John Campbell" <jdc.rpv@cox.net>
Cc: <dsr@w3.org>, <html-tidy@w3.org>, <tidy-develop@lists.sourceforge.net>

Thanks John for your quick response.

It is 55 MB( Mega bytes) only. we do have HTML files size upto 120 MB.

Notepad still supports these large files.

The original 55 MB file and as well as new version load in a web-browser and 
both are working good.

In the orignal file, there are few syntax/structure, HTML, BODY tags are 
repeated and tidy has fixed and extra body tags are replaced with table tag.

my question is the original file loads in front page 2002 and why the new 
version doesn't load and front page shows "Error reading file"? This is the 
only error message i got and we test these files with our inhouse dhtml 
editor whether all open/end tags are matched. This is how we test the html 
file is well formed.

And we tested 7mb file and it is well formed after new version and 55MB file 
sucks to load.

Thanks
Ram







----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Campbell" <jdc.rpv@cox.net>
To: "Devarasetty Ramu" <ramuis78@hotmail.com>
Cc: <dsr@w3.org>; <html-tidy@w3.org>; <tidy-develop@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 1:18 AM
Subject: Re: Error reading file - 55 MB


> Devarasetty Ramu wrote:
>> Hello Dave,
>>
>> First of all i appreciate the Tidy team for inventing this great tool.
>>
>> Tidy tool is doing excellent. I tried with 7MB file and it works great.
>>
>> And i would like to know whether this tool works for larger files also? 
>> B'coz i gave 55 MB file to validate and it took <1 minute to validate and 
>> when i try to open this file in either frontpage 2002 or my dhtml editor, 
>> it just fail to open and giving alert "Error reading file". The same 
>> validated file is opening in NOTEPAD.
>
> Are you sure it's 56MB?  56KB seems more reasonable.  Last I heard, 
> Notepad had a 64KB limit, and that's why Word-Pad exists.  I can't imagine 
> what kind of web connection you'd need to deal with a file that big. 
> Hell, I've seen half hour video clips smaller than that...
>
> You don't mention error messages...  I've never used frontpage, which I 
> assume is what you're using to generate the original file, but I've never 
> seen a Microsoft product that didn't generate reams and reams of warnings 
> from Tidy.
>
> Does the original load in a web-browser?  Does the new version?
> 
Received on Friday, 26 May 2006 14:15:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 April 2012 06:13:56 GMT