- From: Charles Reitzel <creitzel@rcn.com>
- Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 10:34:53 -0500
- To: Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>
- Cc: html-tidy@w3.org
At 11:21 AM 3/5/2003 +0300, you wrote: >Yes, this improves things, but not completely fixes them. For example, >there's no newline after </pre> element. > >So the question remains: is it always possible to get behaviour of the >previous tidy version by tweaking options and where do I learn what >options must be tweaked. No, there is no 4th indenting option. In fact, the new "auto" mode fixes a number of problems with the previous version. Not problems with compliance, but things that could make visual changes in browsers. Also, we received a steady stream of complaints about too many blank lines. >I would like to always use up-to-date tidy version to catch problems, but >OTOH, if each version changes formatting, it's not that usable to >minimizing differences between versions of HTML document stored in CVS, >which is the primary use for me. An excellent idea which, unfortunately, will not work this time. You could continue to use Tidy, but will incur a one-time monster diff. Just thinking out loud here but, for this use, I'd suggest --indent no. You could use --indent auto before you work on it and --indent no before you check it in. take it easy, Charlie
Received on Wednesday, 5 March 2003 10:24:35 UTC