W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > html-tidy@w3.org > January to March 2003

Re: Change in indent style

From: Charles Reitzel <creitzel@rcn.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 10:34:53 -0500
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20030305102807.02929528@pop.rcn.com>
To: Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>
Cc: html-tidy@w3.org

At 11:21 AM 3/5/2003 +0300, you wrote:
>Yes, this improves things, but not completely fixes them. For example, 
>there's no newline after </pre> element.
>
>So the question remains: is it always possible to get behaviour of the 
>previous tidy version by tweaking options and where do I learn what 
>options must be tweaked.

No, there is no 4th indenting option.  In fact, the new "auto" mode fixes a 
number of problems with the previous version.  Not problems with 
compliance, but things that could make visual changes in browsers.  Also, 
we received a steady stream of complaints about too many blank lines.

>I would like to always use up-to-date tidy version to catch problems, but 
>OTOH, if each version changes formatting, it's not that usable to 
>minimizing differences between versions of HTML document stored in CVS, 
>which is the primary use for me.

An excellent idea which, unfortunately, will not work this 
time.  You  could continue to use Tidy, but will incur a one-time monster diff.

Just thinking out loud here but, for this use, I'd suggest --indent 
no.  You could use --indent auto before you work on it and --indent no 
before you check it in.

take it easy,
Charlie
Received on Wednesday, 5 March 2003 10:24:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 April 2012 06:13:53 GMT