I agree with Jany -- provide the version in tidy's meta tag, if only to provide a little more information in the resulting document for debugging situations like this. So tidy.sf.net is now the top-of-tree source for tidy? Is anyone starting automake/autoconf for tidy? jany.quintard@fr.ibm.com wrote: > ... I am getting results which don't cope with [...] > So, I suppose my tidy is different or I use it the wrong way. > [...] > > By the way, why not include the version or build number in the meta tag > generated by tidy ?Received on Friday, 7 September 2001 10:10:38 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 April 2012 06:13:46 GMT