W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > html-tidy@w3.org > January to March 2000

Re: html tidy

From: Bertilo Wennergren <bertilow@hem.passagen.se>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 10:02:15 +0200
Message-ID: <003601bf988c$197f9be0$4100000a@Bertil>
To: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@jelks.nu>, <html-tidy@w3.org>


> > What possible reason would you have for empty tags?  What are you trying to
> > style when there is nothing to style inside the tags?

> With DHTML (the DOM) you can add content.

I that, I believe, is possible also for elements that lack id.
 
> IMO, there should be a "drop-empty-elements-with-IDs" option (though with
> hopefully a shorter name :).  Or better yet, just a "drop-empty-elements"
> option, period.
 
Since an id is not really necessary for an empty span to have (or get)
meaning this is not entirely logical.

======================================================================
                         Bertilo Wennergren
                     <bertilow@hem.passagen.se>
                  <http://purl.oclc.org/NET/bertilo>
======================================================================
Received on Tuesday, 28 March 2000 03:02:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 April 2012 06:13:43 GMT