W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > html-tidy@w3.org > January to March 2000

Enhanced "stylising" request

From: Barney Wol <Barney.Wol@noctua.demon.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 11:45:43 -0600
To: html-tidy@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF16743709.46D14D15-ON8625687F.005BBAF6@rfdinc.com>

Hi Dave,

     The facility to convert old-fashioned FONT tags etc. to STYLE
in HTML Tidy is brilliant, and has certainly helped this novice who
was fighting with the STYLE syntax - thank you!  I find the font size
percentages that are substituted for the old <FONT SIZE="+1"> etc.
don't accurately reflect how my browser (Netscape 4.7 on a Macintosh)
treats the old integer values: is this a symptom of the PC/Macintosh
and Netscape/Explorer incompatibilities?

     There are some slightly surprising omissions from these
"stylising" conversions though:

Colour and background image data, traditionaly added to the <BODY>
tag, can now be encoded within the STYLE definitions.

<B> and <U> tags can also be encoded in STYLE, but Tidy doesn't.

     Would it be a reasonable request that you add these to the
list of extra features to implement on a rainy afternoon?  (We *do*
get plenty of those in England at this time of year :-)



Home: Barney.Wol@noctua.demon.co.uk
Work: Peter_Vince@yahoo.co.uk
PGP id = 0x332B72C0
PGP fingerprint: 3535 9AD9 C0EA 3606 0DE4  3811 422E 10B4 332B 72C0
Received on Friday, 24 March 2000 12:46:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:38:47 UTC