W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > html-tidy@w3.org > January to March 2000

Re: Bug and (bad ?) fix

From: Bruno Rohee <br@spooky.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 23:44:32 +0100
To: html-tidy@w3.org
Cc: crohee@chez.com
Message-ID: <20000119234432.B28337@isildur>
On Wed, Jan 19, 2000 at 11:17:24PM +0100, Bruno Rohee wrote:
> Ok, I took the time to produce a small testcase (by reducing a big crashing
> document, with the help of my father). It's so simple that it's strange that
> nobody found it before...
> 
> You only have to forget <li>'s in an <ul> to crash it. (Sample doc attached)
> 
> The funniest part is that tidy with the patch included considers the document
> to be valid HTML. I hope that someone knowing more the parser internals will
> fix it so node->tag will always have a decent value, my patch should be
> integrated anyway.

That was for the November tidy, January tidy doesn't show this bug, but
my patch can still be applied...

-- 
Research is what I'm doing when I don't know what I'm doing.
		-- Wernher von Braun
Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2000 17:45:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 April 2012 06:13:43 GMT