W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > html-tidy@w3.org > January to March 2000

Re: Bug and (bad ?) fix

From: Bruno Rohee <br@spooky.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 11:45:35 -0600
To: html-tidy@w3.org
Cc: crohee@chez.com
Message-ID: <OF6A8C7770.6DC044C7-ON8625686B.007D7392@rfdinc.com>

On Wed, Jan 19, 2000 at 11:17:24PM +0100, Bruno Rohee wrote:
> Ok, I took the time to produce a small testcase (by reducing a big
> document, with the help of my father). It's so simple that it's strange
> nobody found it before...
> You only have to forget <li>'s in an <ul> to crash it. (Sample doc
> The funniest part is that tidy with the patch included considers the
> to be valid HTML. I hope that someone knowing more the parser internals
> fix it so node->tag will always have a decent value, my patch should be
> integrated anyway.

That was for the November tidy, January tidy doesn't show this bug, but
my patch can still be applied...

Research is what I'm doing when I don't know what I'm doing.
          -- Wernher von Braun
Received on Friday, 24 March 2000 13:14:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:38:47 UTC