- From: Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>
- Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 10:50:51 -0700
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
- Cc: "Aur, Katherine Anderson" <kaaur@sandia.gov>
- Message-Id: <9C5CB82C-8E8A-44F0-83F4-B9DCBBC612A9@lbl.gov>
Oops, forgot the cc, so please use this one for any replies. > On Oct 29, 2020, at 10:49 AM, Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov> wrote: > > Some great feedback from folks I met at a recent workshop... > >> Begin forwarded message: >> >> From: "Aur, Katherine Anderson" <kaaur@sandia.gov <mailto:kaaur@sandia.gov>> >> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Follow-up on DCAT from D3 >> Date: October 28, 2020 at 10:29:11 AM PDT >> To: Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov <mailto:amgreiner@lbl.gov>> >> Cc: "Aur, Katherine Anderson" <kaaur@sandia.gov <mailto:kaaur@sandia.gov>> >> >> Annette, >> >> Sure that’d be great. >> >> Thanks! >> >> Kale >> >> Kale Aur >> R&D Geosciences Engineer >> Sandia National Labs >> >> >>> On Oct 28, 2020, at 11:08 AM, Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov <mailto:amgreiner@lbl.gov>> wrote: >>> >>> Kale, >>> Thanks very much; this is wonderful feedback! Do you mind if I post it to the dataset exchange working group’s public email list and cc you? The editors may want to follow up directly. >>> -Annette >>> >>>> On Oct 28, 2020, at 9:10 AM, Aur, Katherine Anderson <kaaur@sandia.gov <mailto:kaaur@sandia.gov>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Annette, >>>> >>>> We have a few comments on DCAT that might be of use to the committee: >>>> >>>> We added schema:version into the Resource, Dataset and Catalog Classes for versioning information. Might be better to have a DCAT term for this. >>>> >>>> We are using dct:relation, dct:replaces, prov:wasGeneratedBy to show how Resources are related and their provenance. >>>> The official DCATv2 documentation could be more explicit with how to handle these types of situations. We had a few confusing discussions around these terms. >>>> >>>> We found the schema.org <http://schema.org/> vocabulary to be more comprehensive for our purposes than the FOAF vocab for People/Organizations. >>>> >>>> We used more schema.org <http://schema.org/> vocabulary for publications (datePublished, author, publisher, numberOfPages, etc…). These seemed to fit our needs better than the recommended dcat and dct terms for this. >>>> >>>> Consider adding some DCATv2 terms for Software. We used a mix of our own terms and schema.org <http://schema.org/> terms for this. >>>> >>>> I think in general the documentation for DCATv2 could use some more detailed implementation examples to help people better understand the use cases for the different vocab terms. >>>> >>>> We added Documentation and Software classes to describe new Resource that we needed that were not a Dataset or a DataService. We followed the advice on the DCAT pretty well and found this note to be helpful: ‘It is strongly recommended to use a more specific sub-class. When describing a resource which is not a dcat:Dataset or dcat:DataService, it is recommended to create a suitable sub-class of dcat:Resource, or use dcat:Resource with the dct:type property to indicate the specific type.’ >>>> >>>> >>>> Let me know if you have any further questions on any of the items mentioned above. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Kale >>>> >>>> >>>> Kale Aur >>>> R&D Geosciences Engineer >>>> Sandia National Laboratories >>> >
Received on Thursday, 29 October 2020 17:51:09 UTC