- From: David Browning via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 15:03:00 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
While its clear that we have quite a bit to do, I'd prefer that we don't absolutely rule a problem area out quite yet. We have a list of high priority requirements referenced [here](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-wg/2018Nov/0210.html) as discussed and agreed at the F2F, and a target date of mid-January for the rec-track work. We've also talked about generating more examples and/or a primer after that date. That plan gives us some flex on how we can talk to this issue - extend timescales of the rec-track work, provide examples and suggestions or leave it for a further iteration. (All subject to agreement within the WG and the broader W3M) On this specific case, I would agree with @agreiner's comment - it would be good to 'seize the opportunity' - and that it would be great if @dr-shorthair pithy summary "a dataset's distribution, while a single entity, is composed of multiple artefacts" found its way into the recommendation even if just a comment. I don't think it has higher priority than the requirements that we're focussing on now. But I hope we have the luxury of deferring any final inclusion decisions to January. -- GitHub Notification of comment by davebrowning Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/482#issuecomment-437026757 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 8 November 2018 15:03:09 UTC