- From: aisaac via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2018 21:27:43 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
At this stage just add it in the same place as the rest, please! There's no evidence that it's better to separate them, as there's no obvious reason to judge one part is less mature than the other. As per the point I've tried to convey in the F2F in Lyon, the ability to allow extensions of role shouldn't be an argument against providing a list of roles as a default. That list can then be extended. This is the pattern in the Web Annotation Model and Ontology, and it's a good one. -- GitHub Notification of comment by aisaac Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/536#issuecomment-436414686 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2018 21:27:44 UTC