See also: IRC log
minutes approved
? 2005-07-21: pauld to write a proposal for a working group
report for requirements for schema evolution
following closure of LC124
? 2005-10-20: Kendall to contact DAWG to ask for contribution to
test suite, due 2005-10-27.
DONE 2005-11-10: Hugo will start adding assertions to Part 2.
? 2005-11-10: Marsh to take the IRI issue to the CG, due
2005-11-16.
? 2005-12-08: Amy to propose text warning about the knots one
can tie oneself up in when writing an extension.
DONE 2005-01-05: Marsh to contact XQuery and chairs re formal
methods.
DONE 2005-01-05: Marsh to work on typography abstract.
DONE [.4] 2005-01-05: Arthur to check Woden's schedule and report back.
DONE [.5] 2005-01-05: Marsh to ask about CR003 alternatives.
? 2005-01-05: JacekK to detail (e.g. in a list) what constraints
of the component model are not enforced by the WSDL
ontology.
DONE 2005-01-05: Marsh to add link to test suite from home page.
? 2005-01-05: Glen to write an outline for a test service and
send it to the list.
Current Editorial Action Items
DONE [.3] 2005-07-21: Arthur to add stable identifiers for each
assertion, due 2005-09-26.
Note: Editorial AIs associated with LC issues recorded at [.2].
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/actions_owner.html
[.3] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/test-suite/assert-yourself.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jan/0005.html
[.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2006Jan/0000.html
CR published on January 6th, 2006
unclear is action item if still necessary
not much response from XQuery group in response to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jan/att-0004/20060105-ws-desc-minutes.html#action01
<Arthur> fyi, see http://incubator.apache.org/woden/dev/1.0/milestoneplan.html
Jonathan: it doesn't look like a full interop session will be necessary for the Cannes meeting
<Arthur> the woden 1.0 release is planned for april 28
Jonathan to close http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Jul/att-0128/20050721-ws-desc-minutes.html#item07
<Jonathan> ACTION: Arthur to come up with an allocaiton for reviewing assertions. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/01/12-ws-desc-minutes.html#action01]
Arthur: we need review of the identifiers that have been added
discussion around the Cannes meeting, travel arrangements, etc.
no full interop planned for Cannes meeting
Arthur: who else is planning on doing an implementation?
all: discussion (Axis?)
Arthur: the Axis work isn't
independent of Woden
... Axis would create code generators based on Woden's
models
<Jonathan> ACTION: Marsh to send CR announcement to SOAPBuilders. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/01/12-ws-desc-minutes.html#action02]
all: dicussion on socializing our CR status, encouraging implementations
can we post a link to the email we are discussing?
<Arthur> Jeremy Geelan, jeremy@sys-con.com, Web Services Developers Journal
<Jonathan> ACTION: Hugo to find uses of x-www... media types in W3C Recs. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/01/12-ws-desc-minutes.html#action03]
<Jonathan> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2006Jan/0001.html
<Arthur> the publication is actually SOA Web Services Journal http://webservices.sys-con.com/
all: no support for adding a warning about x-www to our documents
background: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jan/0020.html
some discussion around the idea of producing an XSLT to map from WSDL 2.0 component model to RDF
Jonathan: concerned about expanding the scope of our deliverables
JacekK: could produce the XSLT as
a tool
... keep issue open pending further discussion with David
(skip issue)
<JacekK> ACTION: Jacek to investigate with SWDBP WG the status of part-whole ontology [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/01/12-ws-desc-minutes.html#action04]
JacekK: that can sleep for now, its not crucial
<scribe> ACTION: JacekK to contact XMLP WG on blessing http://www.w3.org/2005/10/wsdl-rdf#SOAPMessageExchangePattern to point [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/01/12-ws-desc-minutes.html#action05]
to the concept of a SOAP 1.2 message exchange pattern
Arthur: the test cases that we currently have are being run in Woden
Jonathan: proposes to cancel next weeks call
(no objections)
(more discussion about socializing CR status and inspiring implementations)
Jonathan: everybody in the WG has permission (is encouraged?) to email, blog, etc. about the need for WSDL 2.0 implemenations
<Jonathan> Thanks Gil
was that right?