Return-Path: <www-ws-desc-request@w3.org>
Received: from rgmum1.us.oracle.com by rgmum20.us.oracle.com
	with ESMTP id 170228761067619905; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 10:05:05 -0700
Received: from rgmgw5.us.oracle.com by rgmum3.us.oracle.com
	with ESMTP id 635477261067619838; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 10:03:58 -0700
Received: from rgmgw5.us.oracle.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by rgmgw5.us.oracle.com (Switch-2.1.5/Switch-2.1.0) with ESMTP id h9VH3nK09893;
	Fri, 31 Oct 2003 10:03:54 -0700 (MST)
Received: from agminet01.oracle.com (agminet01.oracle.com [141.146.126.228])
	by rgmgw5.us.oracle.com (Switch-2.1.5/Switch-2.1.0) with ESMTP id h9VH3fK09572;
	Fri, 31 Oct 2003 10:03:42 -0700 (MST)
Received: from agminet01.oracle.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by agminet01.oracle.com (Switch-3.1.2/Switch-3.1.0) with ESMTP id h9VH3bjK018697;
	Fri, 31 Oct 2003 09:03:37 -0800
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [18.29.1.71])
	by agminet01.oracle.com (Switch-3.1.2/Switch-3.1.0) with ESMTP id h9VH3bjK018688;
	Fri, 31 Oct 2003 09:03:37 -0800
Received: by frink.w3.org (Postfix, from userid 59936)
	id 04B1AA0D9D; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 12:03:18 -0500 (EST)
X-Original-To: www-ws-desc@frink.w3.org
Delivered-To: www-ws-desc@frink.w3.org
Received: from dr-nick.w3.org (dr-nick.w3.org [18.29.1.73])
	by frink.w3.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 941A9A0E99
	for <www-ws-desc@frink.w3.org>; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 12:02:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: by dr-nick.w3.org (Postfix)
	id F3B3A142D2; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 12:01:09 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Received: from mail3.microsoft.com (mail3.microsoft.com [131.107.3.123])
	by dr-nick.w3.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE2BA142D4
	for <www-ws-desc@w3.org>; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 12:01:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: from INET-VRS-03.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.5.27]) by mail3.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0);
	 Fri, 31 Oct 2003 09:01:09 -0800
Received: from 157.54.8.23 by INET-VRS-03.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Fri, 31 Oct 2003 09:01:09 -0800
Received: from red-imc-02.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.9.107]) by inet-hub-01.redmond.corp.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0);
	 Fri, 31 Oct 2003 09:01:08 -0800
Received: from win-imc-02.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([157.54.0.84]) by red-imc-02.redmond.corp.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0);
	 Fri, 31 Oct 2003 09:00:57 -0800
Received: from WIN-MSG-10.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([157.54.12.81]) by win-imc-02.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1069);
	 Fri, 31 Oct 2003 09:01:07 -0800
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7097.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 09:01:04 -0800
Message-ID: <DDE1793D7266AD488BB4F5E8D38EACB8039D85CE@WIN-MSG-10.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: RPC Style Issues (3)
thread-index: AcOe+KxRi7dmLtI0TO62vvCNkS9FMAAcZ5RQ
From: "Jeffrey Schlimmer" <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>
To: "Jacek Kopecky" <jacek.kopecky@systinet.com>,
   "Umit Yalcinalp" <umit.yalcinalp@oracle.com>
Cc: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>,
   "Tom Jordahl" <tomj@macromedia.com>,
   "WS Description List" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Oct 2003 17:01:07.0839 (UTC) FILETIME=[93CFD0F0:01C39FD0]
Subject: RE: RPC Style Issues (3)
X-Archived-At: http://www.w3.org/mid/DDE1793D7266AD488BB4F5E8D38EACB8039D85CE@WIN-MSG-10.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com
Resent-From: www-ws-desc@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <www-ws-desc@w3.org> archive/latest/3154
X-Loop: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Sender: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
Resent-Sender: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <www-ws-desc.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Resent-Message-Id: <20031031170318.04B1AA0D9D@frink.w3.org>
Resent-Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 12:03:18 -0500 (EST)


> From: Jacek Kopecky
>=20
> Otherwise, not having the distinction doesn't harm interop.

Don't forget that the RPC style is not needed for interop since it does
not affect the messages that are exchanged. It is a means to convey
intended programming model and should be designed to be sufficient for
that purpose.


