The table below identifies the issues addressed in each of the submitted reports, and attempts to draw some consensus conclusions.
Issue | [1] | [2] | [3] | [4] | [5] | [6] | [7] | [8] | [9] | Conclusions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(dis)agreements | X | |||||||||
RDF(S) layering | X | |||||||||
classical relational properties | X | X | Support for classical relational properties (transitivity, reflexivity, symmetry) is preferable to direct support for partOf, etc. In additional to TransitiveProperty, DAML+OIL should add SymmetricProperty and ReflexiveProperty. | |||||||
compliance | X | |||||||||
daml:collection parseType | X | X | Statement ordering can be important, and is not adequately addressed in DAML+OIL. | |||||||
daml:imports | X | X | X | daml:imports is insufficient and should be extended or removed. | ||||||
datatypes | X | X | ||||||||
equivalence | X | |||||||||
external constraints | X | |||||||||
frame orientation | X | X | Many users prefer a frame orientation, which was largely lost in DAML+OIL. | |||||||
meta-model | X | X | Some users desire an extensible meta-model. | |||||||
multilinguality (internationalization, signs) | X | X | X | RDF and DAML+OIL provide insufficient support for labels across multiple natural languages. | ||||||
n-ary relations | X | X | X | X | Direct support for n-ary relations is desirable. | |||||
ontology documentation | X | |||||||||
query language | X | |||||||||
redundancy | X | X | X | The ability to express the same thing in multiple ways can be problematic. | ||||||
reification | X | X | There's strong interest in being able to make statements about (asserted) statements. | |||||||
roles | X | |||||||||
rules | X | X | ||||||||
simplification | X | X |