Message-Id: <cetesz_0M2Yt53sZli@thumper.bellcore.com> Date: Thu, 22 Oct 1992 09:35:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Nathaniel Borenstein <nsb@thumper.bellcore.com> To: gopher@boombox.micro.umn.edu, wais-talk@quake.think.com, Subject: Re: misconceptions about MIME [long] Cc: nsb@bellcore.com In-Reply-To: <9210220109.AA02869@pixel.convex.com> Dan's comments are right on the money. As an example of how you can treat non-mail-oriented data as being in MIME format, I've recently written a script that makes it trivial to set up a MIME-smart mailserver daemon for, say, everything in your anonymous ftp directory. This script -- which will be part of the next metamail release -- accepts mail requests that give path names relative to the anonymous ftp root, e.g. "pub/nsb/BodyFormats.txt" and sends the results back as MIME-format mail. The neat thing is that the files themselves don't need to be in MIME format. The files are assumed to be plain text unless there is a ".ct" file (e.g. "pub/nsb/BodyFormats.txt.ct") in which case that file is assumed to contain the Content-type information. Thus if you have a gif image in file "foo", you can put the text "image/gif" in the file "foo.ct" and the mailserver will be ready to send the GIF image as MIME-format mail. The script is smart enough, using the metamail tools, to deal with any necessary encoding for mail transport, even though the raw data is unencoded. The point is that, as Dan says, the data doesn't need to be explicitly in MIME format. MIME body parts are just (possibly encoded) data in reasonably standard formats. If you don't enclose it in a mail-ish thing with a content-type header field, you need some other "out-of-band" way of providing the type information, but this can be done in many ways, e.g. the ".ct" files my mailserver uses. Viewed this way, all that MIME is really comes down to three things: 1. A mechanism for encoding arbitrary data for mail transport. This is orthogonal to the other parts and can be largely ignored in non-mail applications. 2. A mechanism for combining multiple objects in a "multipart" format defined by MIME. This doesn't need to be used by non-mail applications, but a common way of doing this has obvious value. Why shouldn't multi-media objects be shared across email, wais, gopher, and www? 3. A naming convention and a set of standard names for describing data types such as "image/gif" and "audio/basic". The common naming conventions are perhaps the most valuable aspect of MIME for non-mail applications, as it is pretty obviously silly to give slightly different names to the same things in different systems. Anyway, as a principle author of MIME I know I'm not in a great position to appear to be objective, but I really don't see any good reasons not to use MIME in applicaitons such as gopher, wais, or www. -- Nathaniel