Date: Tue, 24 Mar 92 11:23:31 GMT+0100 From: timbl (Tim Berners-Lee) Message-Id: <9203241023.AA19187@ nxoc01.cern.ch > To: jfg@bernd.cern.ch (Jean-Francois Groff) Subject: Mapping names in the server Cc: www-talk@nxoc01.cern.ch Ed, As JF says, you can map logical document names to real file names in the server by means of the rule file. We didn't put the rule file into the client, because we didn't want the start-up time to be long. Also, we wanted a W3 document name to be followable by anyone, not just the few who have picked up the latest gems of rule file titbits. (There were a couple of starts missing from JF's example, which should have been map rfc:* file://ftp.nisc.sri.com/rfc/* ) Actually the current distributed server expects the output of the rule file to be a local filename. You would have to modify it to expect a w3 address. In the long term, a name service should exist to translate name-service:/org/isoc/rfc/959 into say file://ftp.nisc.sri.com/rfc/rfc959.ps and .txt. As noone seems to want to extend the DNS, it looks as though x500 is the best bet. There was some discussion on this at the IETF, though it'll be a while before x500 is all over. Tim