- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 23:36:39 +0100
- To: Matthew Leingang <leingang@math.harvard.edu>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
A recent draft [2] put out by the Semantic Web Best Practices and Deployment Working Group [1] might have some useful ideas for you: #g -- [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/ [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-n-aryRelations/ At 16:42 04/08/04 -0400, Matthew Leingang wrote: >Hi all, > >Long time lurker, first time poster. > >I'm thinking about generating RDF from my Books [1] database to publish >online (why not? :-). Books allows you store lots of data, not only about >the book, but when you got it, who you loaned it to, etc. > >How does one best put something like "I have owned this book since August 1, >2004" in RDF? Without the date I could just say > >:me foaf:owns [a book:Book; book:isbn "012345678"] . > >(assuming we have a book schema someplace with a Book class and isbn >property). With the date we have a qualification of the foaf:owns property. >When implementing this first in python, I started creating >"AgentObjectAssociation" classes for want of a better term. Then about a >day later I realized that these AgentObjectAssociations were just subclasses >of regular RDF triples. It seems, then, that you can do this by reifying >the statement and adding whatever other properties & types you want: > >[a rdfs:Statement; > rdfs:subject :me; > rdfs:predicate foaf:owns; > rdfs:object [a book:Book; book:isbn "012345678"]; > a ical:Vevent; > ical:dtstart "2004-08-01".] > >I don't know if this is a misuse of ical to talk about *any* event, not just >one that one might schedule in a PIM tool. But another schema for events >could be used if necessary. > >I recall from the one of the RDF TR's that the set of statements > >[a rdfs:Statement; rdfs:subject :a; rdfs:predicate :b; rdfs:object :c] > >doesn't necessarily have to imply :a :b :c (which is a good thing: >"declaring 'Mission Accomplished' doesn't make it so"!) and that made me shy >away from using qualified statements like this. But it seems useful. >Another use would be to give the authority of a statement, so an agent can >decide which one to accept: > >[a rdfs:Statement; > rdfs:subject :LeeHarveyOswald; > rdfs:predicate :killed; > rdfs:object :JohnFKennedy; > dc:creator :WarrenCommission >]. > >[a rdfs:Statement; > rdfs:subject :Mafia > rdfs:predicate :killed; > rdfs:object :JohnFKennedy; > dc:creator :OliverStone >]. > >Sorry if my N3 is off, but hopefully you get my drift. So I guess I'm >asking is: is this "in or out of line" (to borrow the question of a previous >poster)? Are there other ways to employ adverbial prepositional phrases >like "since" or "according to" in RDF? > >Thanks for any help. > >--Matthew Leingang > >[1] http://books.aetherial.net/ > >-- >Matthew Leingang >Preceptor in Mathematics >Harvard University > >URL: http://www.math.harvard.edu/~leingang/ >vCard: http://www.math.harvard.edu/~leingang/vCard.vcf ------------ Graham Klyne For email: http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact
Received on Wednesday, 4 August 2004 18:48:21 UTC