Web Ontology Language (OWL) Test Cases
Editors Working Draft 17 December 2002
- This version:
- No URI
- Latest version:
- http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-test/
- Previous version:
- http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-owl-test-20021024/
- Editors:
- Jeremy J. Carroll, HP
<jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Jos De Roo, AGFA,<jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
The tests of this document are also available in these non-normative formats:
Zip archive of approved tests, Zip archive of proposed tests, the test web site.
Copyright
©2002 W3C® (MIT, INRIA, Keio), All
Rights Reserved. W3C liability,
trademark,
document
use and software
licensing rules apply.
This document contains and presents test cases for the Web Ontology Language
(OWL) approved by the Web Ontology Working Group. Many of the test cases
illustrate the correct usage of the Web Ontology Language (OWL), and the formal
meaning of its constructs. Other test cases illustrate the resolution of issues
considered by the working group.
Status below is fictitious.
This section describes the status of this document at the time of its
publication. Other documents may supersede this document. The latest status of
this document series is maintained at the W3C.
The approved test cases in this document represent the consensus of the Web
Ontology Working Group as at 7th October 2002. In later versions of this
document many of the proposed tests will have moved into the approved tests
section, either positively or negatively, depending on the working group
consensus on the underlying issues. This document is subsidiary to the other Web
Ontology Language recommendation track documents ([OWL Language] and [OWL Abstract Syntax and
Semantics]) that give the formal definition of the language. The test cases
described in this document (both approved and proposed) may be updated,
replaced, negated or obsoleted at any time; despite this the working group would
value implementor feedback on them. For this first Working Draft, feedback is
particularly sought on issues of test format, description, process and
presentation.
Comments on this document should be sent to public-webont-comments@w3.org, a
mailing list with a public
archive. General discussion of related technology is welcome in www-rdf-logic.
See also patent disclosures related to this work.
This is a W3C Working Draft for review by W3C members and other interested
parties. It is a draft document and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by
other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use W3C Working Drafts as
reference materials or to cite them as other than "work in progress." A list of
current W3C Recommendations and other technical documents can be found at http://www.w3.org/TR/.
This document has been produced as part of the W3C Semantic Web Activity (Activity Statement) following the
procedures set out for the W3C Process.
The document has been written by the Web Ontology Working Group. The
goals of the Web Ontology working group are discussed in the Web Ontology Working Group
charter.
As part of the definition of the Web Ontology Language (OWL) [OWL Language] the Web Ontology Working Group
provides a set of test cases. This document contains
those test cases. They are intended to provide examples for, and clarification
of, the other recommendation track documents ([OWL
Language] and [OWL Abstract
Syntax and Semantics]) to which this document is subsiduary.
This document describes the various types of test used and the format in
which the tests are presented. Alternative formats of the test collection are
provided. These are intended to be suitable for use by OWL developers in test
harnesses, possibly as part of a test driven development process, such as
Extreme Programming [XP]. The format of the
Manifest files used as part of these alternative formats is
described.
This document describes the process for conflict resolution and errata
related to these tests.
In the non-normative appendices, this document also describes the process for
creation and approval of these tests.
Further appendices show further proposed tests that are awaiting resolution
by the working group.
Various conformance levels are defined in this
document in terms of the other normative OWL recommendations.
The test cases do not constitute a conformance test suite for OWL.
However, systems that conform at various levels are required to pass the
pertinent tests.
The test illustrate issue resolutions, and illustrate the use and meaning of
the terms in the OWL namespace.
There are other miscellaneous tests motivated individually [[none in this version]] .
The deliverables included as part of the test cases are:
- This recommendation track document, which normatively includes the tests.
- Additional alternative forms of the normative tests. These are also
included in informative appendices to this document.
- A zip file including
- The RDF/XML files that participate in the tests
- Manifest files indicating which tests should be apply to which test
files.
- The non-normative alternative forms of the test files.
This zip
file is a non-normative alternative format.
- A web-site which includes the
files in the zip file. This also is a non-normative alternative format.
Note: Other files can be found under the top URL
of the web-site which are not part of the deliverable.
[[EDITORS' NOTE: Do we want index files for the web site that
clarify which parts are part of the deliverable and which are not?]]
Of the deliverables the only normative tests are those included in this document. All other
deliverables, are informative. Moreover, the recommendation document is
informative except for the test data (specified in RDF/XML [RDF/XML?Syntax]), and the supporting
documentation.
When the normative tests and the other normative OWL recommendations diverge
the following process should be followed.
If the OWL working drafts are at or before Candidate Recommendation then:
- The conflict is reported to public-webont-comments@w3.org.
- The working group makes appropriate modifications to remove the conflict.
If the OWL recommendation has passed Candidate Recommendation then:
- The conflict is reported to public-webont-comments@w3.org.
- The working group, or its successors, considers the conflict
- While this happens the other recommendation documents take precedence over
the test case.
- If there is working group consensus to retain the test case as normative
and to publish an erratum against the other recommendation document(s) then
this is done.
- Otherwise an erratum is published which deletes the test case.
Note: this last step does not require consensus,
or even a majority.
Note: the errata process over the tests is
monotonic decreasing.
Each test consists of either one or more RDF/XML documents and a
Manifest file. Tests of one document indicate some property of that
document when viewed as an OWL knowledge base. Tests of two or more documents
indicate a relationship between the two documents when viewed as OWL knowledge
bases.
The Manifest file is named ManifestNNN.rdf
(The NNN is replaced by the test number). It contains
metadata (in RDF) indicating the test type, and describing the test.
These tests use one document. It is named badNNN.rdf.
This document includes a use of the OWL namespace with a local name that is not
defined by the OWL recommendation.
Note: These tests are intended to help migration
from DAML+OIL [DAML+OIL], since the local names
chosen are defined in the DAML+OIL namespace.
These tests use two documents. One is named
premisesNNN.rdf, the other is named
conclusionsNNN.rdf. The conclusions are
entailed by the premises. Such entailment is defined by the OWL
semantics [OWL Abstract Syntax
and Semantics].
These tests use two documents. One is named
premisesNNN.rdf, the other is named
nonconclusionsNNN.rdf. The nonconclusions are
not entailed by the premises. Such entailment is defined by the OWL
semantics [OWL Abstract Syntax
and Semantics].
These tests use one document. It is named
consistentNNN.rdf. The document is consistent as defined
by the OWL Semantics [OWL
Abstract Syntax and Semantics].
These tests use one document. It is named
inconsistentNNN.rdf. The document is inconsistent as
defined by the OWL semantics [OWL Abstract Syntax and
Semantics].
These tests use more than two documents. One is named
premisesNNN.rdf, another is named
conclusionsNNN.rdf, the rest have names beginning
supportNNN.rdf. The support documents are in
the imports closure [Link needed] of the
premises document. The conclusions are entailed by the
imports closure of the premises. Such entailment is defined by the
OWL semantics [OWL Abstract
Syntax and Semantics].
During development, tests that are not of one of the above types, are
classified as miscellaneous while awaiting a new test type to be defined.
This section uses the language of [RFC 2117].
A language tool without a reasoning capability MAY claim OWL Lite conformance if it can:
A language tool without a reasoning capability MAY claim OWL DL conformance If it is OWL Lite
conformant and it can:
- Accept all OWL constructs.
- Distinguish RDF/XML documents that conform with OWL DL from those that do
not. Specifically, it MUST identify those RDF/XML documents that can be formed
by applying the mapping from the abstract syntax for OWL
DL.
Reasoning components MAY claim complete OWL DL conformance
[or complete OWL Lite
conformance] if they provide complete reasoning over OWL DL [or OWL
Lite]. i.e. A conformant complete OWL DL [Lite] reasoner MUST find proofs for
all OWL DL [Lite] inferences. A conformant complete OWL DL [Lite] reasoner MAY
find proofs for any OWL Full inference. A system which claims complete OWL DL conformance MUST
also be OWL DL conformant.A system which
claims complete OWL Lite
conformance MUST also be OWL Lite?
conformant.
A document MAY be described as an OWL Lite
document if:
A document MAY be described as an OWL DL
document if:
The Manifest file follows the RDF schema developed for the RDF
Test Cases [RDF Test Cases].
This is augmented by a few new properties and types which are declared in the
OWL Test Ontology, found at http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/testOntology.
Specifically each test has its own Manifest file, and is
identified from the URI reference formed from the Manifest file's
URL with a fragment test.
The test has one rdf:type explicit, and this is one of:
otest:NotOwlFeatureTest
- A test for the incorrect us of OWL namespace.
otest:PositiveEntailmentTest
- An entailment test.
otest:NegativeEntailmentTest
- A non-entailment test.
otest:ConsistencyTest
- A consistency test.
otest:InconsistencyTest
- An inconsistency test.
otest:ImportEntailmentTest
- An import entailment test.
rtest:MiscellaneousTest
- Some other test.
Where otest is bound to
http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/testOntology# and rtest
is bound to
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/testSchema#.
The name of the original author of the test is shown using a
dc:creator property, see [Dublin
Core].
A description of the test is given (using XHTML markup [XHTML]) as the value of the
rtest:description property.
An issue, if any, from the OWL Issues list [OWL
Issues], is the value of a rtest:issue property.
An appropriate language feature, from the OWL namespace, if any, is the value
of the otest:feature property.
The input documents with the test data are found as the value of the
rtest:inputDocument property or as the value of both the
rtest:premiseDocument and the
rtest:conclusionDocument. The support files for import entailment
tests are found as the values of otest:importedPremiseDocument.
The conformance level associated with both files and tests are given with the
otest:level property. The value for each document and test is one
of otest:Full, otest:DL or otest:Lite.
6. The OWL Tests
(Normative)6.1. By
Function
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
001 |
| Description:
(informative) |
If prop belongs to
owl:FunctionalProperty, and subject denotes a
resource and has two outgoing prop arcs, then the
objects of these arcs have the same denotation. |
| Full |
Premises: |
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:owl ="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xmlns:first="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/FunctionalProperty/premises001#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/FunctionalProperty/premises001" >
<owl:FunctionalProperty rdf:ID="prop"/>
<rdf:Description rdf:ID="subject">
<first:prop rdf:resource="#object1" />
<first:prop rdf:resource="#object2" />
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Conclusions: |
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:owl ="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/FunctionalProperty/conclusions001" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="premises001#object1">
<owl:sameIndividualAs rdf:resource="premises001#object2" />
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
002 |
| Description:
(informative) |
If prop belongs to
owl:FunctionalProperty, and subject denotes a
resource and has two outgoing prop arcs, then the
objects of these arcs have the same denotation. Hence an arc
originating in object1 can be copied to
object2. |
| Full |
Premises: |
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:owl ="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xmlns:eg ="http://www.example.org/"
xmlns:first="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/FunctionalProperty/premises002#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/FunctionalProperty/premises002" >
&?t;owl:FunctionalProperty rdf:ID="prop"/>
<rdf:Description rdf:ID="subject">
<first:prop>
<rdf:Description rdf:ID="object1">
<eg:prop2>value</eg:prop2>
</rdf:Description>
</first:prop>
<first:prop rdf:resource="#object2" />
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Conclusions: |
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:eg ="http://www.example.org/"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/FunctionalProperty/conclusions002" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="premises002#object2" >
<eg:prop2>value</eg:prop2>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
001 |
| Description:
(informative) |
If prop belongs to
owl:InverseFunctionalProperty, and object
denotes a resource and has two incoming prop arcs, then the
subjects of these arcs have the same denotation. |
| Full |
Premises: |
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:owl ="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xmlns:first="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/InverseFunctionalProperty/premises001#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/InverseFunctionalProperty/premises001" >
<owl:InverseFunctionalProperty rdf:ID="prop"/>
<rdf:Description rdf:ID="subject1">
<first:prop rdf:resource="#object" />
</rdf:Description>
<rdf:Description rdf:ID="subject2">
<first:prop rdf:resource="#object" />
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Conclusions: |
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:owl ="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/InverseFunctionalProperty/conclusions001" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="premises001#subject1">
<owl:sameIndividualAs rdf:resource="premises001#subject2" />
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
002 |
| Description:
(informative) |
If prop belongs to
owl:InverseFunctionalProperty, and object
denotes a resource and has two incoming prop arcs, then the
subjects of these arcs have the same denotation. Hence an arc
originating in subject1 can be copied to
subject2. |
| Full |
Premises: |
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:owl ="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xmlns:eg ="http://www.example.org/"
xmlns:first="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/InverseFunctionalProperty/premises002#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/InverseFunctionalProperty/premises002" >
<owl:InverseFunctionalProperty rdf:ID="prop"/>
<rdf:Description rdf:ID="subject1" >
<first:prop rdf:resource="#object" />
<eg:prop2>value</eg:prop2>
</rdf:Description>
<rdf:Description rdf:ID="subject2" >
<first:prop rdf:resource="#object" />
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Conclusions: |
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:eg ="http://www.example.org/"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/InverseFunctionalProperty/conclusions002" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="premises002#subject2" >
<eg:prop2>value</eg:prop2>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
001 |
| Description:
(informative) |
If the pair (x,y) is an
instance of P, than the pair (y,x) is an
instance of the named property. |
| Full |
Premises: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:my="http://example.net/myVocab#"
xmlns:eg="http://example.net/vocab#"
xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:your="http://example.net/yourVocab#">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.net/myVocab#hasBrother">
<owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="http://example.net/yourVocab#isBrotherOf"/>
</rdf:Description>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.net/vocab#joe">
<my:hasBrother rdf:resource="http://example.net/vocab#bob"/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Conclusions: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:your="http://example.net/yourVocab#">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.ne?/vocab#bob">
<your:isBrotherOf rdf:resource="http://example.net/vocab#joe"/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Lite |
Illegal use of OWL namespace. |
001 |
| Description:
(informative) |
| A DAML+OIL qualified cardinality
constraint is not legal OWL. |
| Lite |
Incorrect: |
<!DOCTYPE rdf:RDF [
<!ENTITY owl "http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#">
]>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:eg="http://example.org/"
xmlns:owl="&owl;"
>
<owl:Restriction owl:cardinalityQ="1">
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="#exampleProp"/>
<owl:hasClassQ rdf:resource="#exampleClass"/>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Lite |
Illegal use of OWL namespace. |
002 |
| Description:
(informative) |
| A DAML+OIL qualified max cardinality
constraint is not legal OWL. |
| Lite |
Incorrect: |
<!DOCTYPE rdf:RDF [
<!ENTITY owl "http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#">
]>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:owl="&owl;"
>
<owl:Restriction owl:maxCardinalityQ="1">
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="#exampleProp"/>
<owl:hasClassQ rdf:resource="#exampleClass"/>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Lite |
Illegal use of OWL namespace. |
003 |
| Description:
(informative) |
| A DAML+OIL qualified min cardinality
constraint is not legal OWL. |
| Lite |
Incorrect: |
<!DOCTYPE rdf:RDF [
<!ENTITY owl "http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#">
]>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/199?/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:eg="http://example.org/"
xmlns:owl="&owl;"
>
<owl:Restriction owl:minCardinalityQ="1">
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="#exampleProp"/>
<owl:hasClassQ rdf:resource="#exampleClass"/>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdf:RDF> |
Tests are created by members of the working group. An (optional) test editor is
provided to facilitate this. Tests are then placed in the appropriate directory
in the test web site. This is done
using CVS access to the W3C CVS server [W3C CVS].
When created, tests are given a status of "PROPOSED". The author
of the test creates a Manifest file in the directory of the new test,
identifying:
- The creator of the test.
- The test type.
- A description of the test.
- The RDF/XML files used in the test.
- The status as
"PROPOSED".
- At least one of:
- An OWL feature that the test illustrates (by reference to the name of
some property or class in the OWL namespace.
- An issue that the test case is related to (by reference to the issue URI
as specified in the OWL issues list [OWL
Issues].
- Some other rationale for the test.
Optionally:
- Some part of the recommendation documents which are particularly relevant.
At the chair's discretion, individual tests or groups of tests are put to the
working group in the weekly telecon or at a face-to-face meeting.
The chair actions two members of the working group to review the tests a week
before putting the test to the group.
If the Working Group approves a test, then it is included in the test case
document.
The Working Group may reject a test, in which case its status is changed to
"REJECTED". This does not indicate that the converse of the test
has been accepted. There may be stylistic or other grounds for rejecting
technically correct tests.
The Working Group has complete discretion to approve or reject tests
independent of their conformance with this process or their conformance with the
OWL working drafts.
In the light of new information, and at the chairs' discretion, the working
group may review any previous decision regarding any test cases. The status of
"OBSOLETED" may be used where a test has ceased to be appropriate.
Until this document reaches last call, the editors may make editorial changes
to approved and proposed tests. This includes:
- Editorial changes to text in the test descriptions.
- Fixing of typos and trivial errors.
- Moving tests to conform with document naming conventions.
- Renaming and renumbering tests and test files.
- Small substantive changes resulting from other working group decisions.
- Larger substantive changes resulting from other working group decisions
when actioned by the working group.
- Stylistic changes reflecting changes to the preferences expressed in this document.
There is a preference for the following stylistic rules. None of these rules
is obligatory, but test authors should be minded that it will be easier to gain
working gain group consensus if they follow these rules.
Tests should normally be expressed in RDF/XML.
?he following RDF/XML grammar rules [RDF/XML
Syntax] are not used:
- Property
attributes.
- Bag ID.
rdf:parseType="Resource".
Test and manifest files should have an xml:base attribute [XMLBASE] on the document element. This should show the
preferred URL of the document, from which it is actually retrievable.
Files that contain no relative URIs may omit the xml:base
attribute.
Test and manifest files should use the ".rdf" suffix. URIs
should not. The URL used for xml:base declarations does not have a
suffix.
All URLs in the test and manifest files should be retrievable web resources
except for those that use domain names with "example" as the
penultimate component (e.g. http://www.example.org/ontology#prop").
The following copyright statement should be included as an XML comment in
every test file:
<!--
Copyright World Wide Web Consortium, (Massachusetts Institute of
Technology, Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en
Automatique, Keio University).
All Rights Reserved.
Please see the full Copyright clause at
<http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/copyright-software.html>
$Id: This string is updated by cvs. $
-->
The description should:
- Link to relevant parts of of the OWL recommendations.
- Clearly distinguish syntactic and semantic concerns.
The description should be included as an XML comment in each test file, and
be included as RDF content in the Manifest file.
Tests that relate principally to some owl property or class, should be put in
a directory named using the local name of that property of class.
Otherwise, tests that relate to an issue should be put in a directory named
like I3.4 where the issue number is taken from the OWL issue list
[OWL Issues].
Each directory should contain tests numbered consecutively from
001.
No two tests in a single directory should have the same number.
Each file in a test should have the number of the test at the end of its
name, before the suffix.
The rest of the file name should follow the conventions for the test type.
Note: the approved tests in a directory will not
necessarily be contiguously numbered.
Note: this differs from the RDF Core test case
numbering conventions.
This section repeats the normative tests.
This time the test data is shown in simple triples, using N-triple syntax [RDF Test Cases] with qnames. Qnames are used in
place of URIs in the syntax with no delimiters. This syntax conforms with the
usage in N3 [N3], the namespace prefices are also declared
using N3 syntax [N3].
The following namespace prefixes are used throughout:
rdf
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
rdfs
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
owl
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
first
- The URL of the first file concatenated with
#
second
- The URL of the second file concatenated with
#
In the N3 syntax [N3] used for namespace declarations,
the first three appear as follows:
| Namespaces: |
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
|
Other namespaces are explicitly listed with the test data.
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
001 |
| Description:
|
If prop belongs to
owl:FunctionalProperty, and subject denotes a
resource and has two outgoing prop arcs, then the
objects of these arcs have the same denotation. |
| Full |
Premises: |
first:prop rdf:type owl:FunctionalProperty .
first:subject first:prop first:object1 .
first:subject first:prop first:object2 .
|
| Full |
Conclusions: |
first:object1 owl:sameIndividualAs first:object2 .
|
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
002 |
| Description:
|
If prop belongs to
owl:FunctionalProperty, and subject denotes a
resource and has two outgoing prop arcs, then the
objects of these arcs have the same denotation. Hence an arc
originating in object1 can be copied to
object2. |
| Namespaces: |
@prefix eg: &l?;http://www.example.org/> .
|
| Full |
Premises: |
first:prop rdf:type owl:FunctionalProperty .
first:object1 eg:prop2 "value" .
first:subject first:prop first:object1 .
first:subject first:prop first:object2 .
|
| Full |
Conclusions: |
first:object2 eg:prop2 "value" .
|
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
001 |
| Description:
|
If prop belongs to
owl:InverseFunctionalProperty, and object
denotes a resource and has two incoming prop arcs, then the
subjects of these arcs have the same denotation. |
| Full |
Premises: |
first:prop rdf:type owl:InverseFunctionalProperty .
first:subject1 first:prop first:object .
first:subject2 first:prop first:object .
|
| Full |
Conclusions: |
first:subject1 owl:sameIndividualAs first:subject2 .
|
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
002 |
| Description:
|
If prop belongs to
owl:InverseFunctionalProperty, and object
denotes a resource and has two incoming prop arcs, then the
subjects of these arcs have the same denotation. Hence an arc
originating in subject1 can be copied to
subject2. |
| Namespaces: |
@prefix eg: <http://www.example.org/> .
|
| Full |
Premises: |
first:prop rdf:type owl:InverseFunctionalProperty .
first:subject1 first:prop first:object .
first:subject1 eg:prop2 "value" .
first:subject2 first:prop first:object .
|
| Full |
Conclusions: |
first:subject2 eg:prop2 "value" .
|
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
001 |
| Description:
|
If the pair (x,y) is an
instance of P, than the pair (y,x) is an
instance of the named property. |
| Namespaces: |
@prefix my: <http://example.net/myVocab#> .
@prefix your: <http://example.net/yourVocab#> .
@prefix eg: <http://example.net/vocab#> .
|
| Full |
Premises: |
my:hasBrother owl:inverseOf your:isBrotherOf .
eg:joe my:hasBrother eg:bob .
|
| Full |
Conclusions: |
eg:bob your:isBrotherOf eg:joe .
|
| Lite |
Illegal use of OWL namespace. |
001 |
| Description:
|
| A DAML+OIL qualified cardinality
constraint is not legal OWL. |
| Namespaces: |
@prefix eg: <http://example.org/> .
|
| Lite |
Incorrect: |
_:jARP1800 rdf:type owl:Restriction .
_:jARP1800 owl:cardinalityQ "1" .
_:jARP1800 owl:onProperty first:exampleProp .
_:jARP1800 owl:hasClassQ first:exampleClass .
|
| Lite |
Illegal use of OWL namespace. |
002 |
| Description:
|
| A DAML+OIL qualified max cardinality
constraint is not lega? OWL. |
| Lite |
Incorrect: |
_:jARP1803 rdf:type owl:Restriction .
_:jARP1803 owl:maxCardinalityQ "1" .
_:jARP1803 owl:onProperty first:exampleProp .
_:jARP1803 owl:hasClassQ first:exampleClass .
|
| Lite |
Illegal use of OWL namespace. |
003 |
| Description:
|
| A DAML+OIL qualified min cardinality
constraint is not legal OWL. |
| Namespaces: |
@prefix eg: <http://example.org/> .
|
| Lite |
Incorrect: |
_:jARP1806 rdf:type owl:Restriction .
_:jARP1806 owl:minCardinalityQ "1" .
_:jARP1806 owl:onProperty first:exampleProp .
_:jARP1806 owl:hasClassQ first:exampleClass .
|
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
003 |
| Description:
|
If prop is an
owl:FunctionalProperty, then its inverse is an
owl:InverseFunctionalProperty. |
| Full |
Premises: |
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:owl ="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/FunctionalProperty/premises003" >
<owl:FunctionalProperty rdf:ID="prop">
<owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="#inv"/>
</owl:FunctionalProperty>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Conclusions: |
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:owl ="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/FunctionalProperty/conclusions003" >
<owl:InverseFunctionalProperty rdf:about="premises003#inv"/>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
004 |
| Description:
|
If the range of prop is a
singleton set then it is necessarily functional, (i.e. every member of its
domain has a single value) and so it is an
owl:FunctionalProperty. |
| Full |
Premises: |
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:owl ="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/FunctionalProperty/premises004" >
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:ID="prop">
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="#Singleton"/>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<rdfs:Class rdf:ID="Singleton">
<owl:oneOf rdf:parseType="Collection">
<rdf:Description/>
</owl:oneOf>
</rdfs:Class>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Conclusions: |
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:owl ="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/FunctionalProperty/conclusions004" >
<owl:FunctionalProperty rdf:about="premises004#prop"/>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
005 |
| Description:
|
If prop belongs to
owl:FunctionalProperty then an OWL object has at most one
value for prop. |
| Full |
Premises: |
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:owl ="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xmlns:eg ="http://www.example.org/">
<owl:FunctionalProperty rdf:about="http://www.example.org/foo#prop" />
<owl:Thing rdf:about="http://www.example.org/foo#object" />
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Conclusions: |
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:owl ="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xmlns:eg ="http://www.example.org/">
<owl:Thing rdf:about="http://www.example.org/foo#object">
<rdf:type>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty>
<owl:FunctionalProperty rdf:about="http://www.example.org/foo#prop" />
</owl:onProperty>
<owl:maxCardinality
rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#nonNegativeInteger"
>1</owl:maxCardinality>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdf:type>
</owl:Thing>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
003 |
| Description:
|
If prop is an
owl:InverseFunctionalProperty, then its inverse is an
owl:FunctionalProperty. |
| Full |
Premises: |
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:owl ="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/InverseFunctionalProperty/premises003" >
<owl:InverseFunctionalProperty rdf:ID="prop">
<owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="#inv"/>
</owl:InverseFunctionalProperty>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Conclusions: |
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:owl ="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/InverseFunctionalProperty/conclusions003" >
<owl:FunctionalProperty rdf:about="premises003#inv"/>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
004 |
| Description:
|
If the domain of prop is
a singleton set then it is necessarily inverse functional, (i.e. every
member of its range is the value of a single item) so it is an
owl:InverseFunctionalProperty. |
| Full |
Premises: |
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:owl ="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/InverseFunctionalProperty/premises004" >
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:ID="prop">
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="#Singleton"/>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<rdfs:Class rdf:ID="Singleton">
<owl:oneOf rdf:parseType="Collection">
<rdf:Description/>
</owl:oneOf>
</rdfs:Class>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Conclusions: |
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:owl ="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/InverseFunctionalProperty/conclusions004" >
<owl:InverseFunctionalProperty rdf:about="premises004#prop"/>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Inconsistent document. |
001 |
| Description:
|
The triple asserts something of type
Nothing, however that is the empty class. |
| Full |
Inconsistent: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#">
<owl:Nothing/>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
002 |
| Description:
|
There is one empty
owl:Class, and it is often called Nothing. |
| Full |
Premises: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Conclusions: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#">
<owl:Class>
<owl:oneOf rdf:parseType="Collection">
</owl:oneOf>
<owl:sameClassAs
rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Nothing" />
</owl:Class>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
001 |
| Description:
|
| A simple illustration of
transitivity. |
| Full |
Premises: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xmlns:first="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/TransitiveProperty/premises001#"
xmlns:second="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/TransitiveProperty/conclusions001#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/TransitiveProperty/premises001" >
<rdf:Description rdf:abou?="premises001#Antwerp">
<first:path rdf:resource="premises001#Amsterdam"/>
</rdf:Description>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="premises001#Ghent">
<first:path rdf:resource="premises001#Antwerp"/>
</rdf:Description>
<owl:TransitiveProperty rdf:about="premises001#path">
</owl:TransitiveProperty>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Conclusions: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xmlns:first="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/TransitiveProperty/premises001#"
xmlns:second="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/TransitiveProperty/conclusions001#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/TransitiveProperty/conclusions001" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="premises001#Ghent">
<first:path rdf:resource="premises001#Amsterdam"/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Lite |
Positive Entailment Test: |
001 |
| Description:
|
| A simple example. |
| Lite |
Premises: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xmlns:first="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/allValuesFrom/premises001#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/allValuesFrom/premises001" >
<owl:Class rdf:ID="r">
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="#p"/>
<owl:allValuesFrom rdf:resource="#c"/>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
</owl:Class>
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:ID="p">
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Thing"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Thing"/>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<owl:Class rdf:ID="c"/>
<first:r rdf:ID="i">
<rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Thing"/>
<first:p>
<owl:Thing rdf:ID="o" />
</first:p>
</first:r>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Lite |
Conclusions: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:first="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/allValuesFrom/premises001#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/allValuesFrom/conclusions001" >
<first:c rdf:about="premises001#o">
<rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Thing"/>
</first:c>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Lite |
Negative Entailment Test: |
002 |
| Description:
|
| See someValuesFrom. |
| Lite |
Premises: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xmlns:first="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/allValuesFrom/premises002#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/allValuesFrom/premises002" >
<owl:Class rdf:ID="r">
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="#p"/>
<owl:allValuesFrom rdf:resource="#c"/>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
</owl:Class>
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:ID="p">
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Thing"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Thing"/>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<owl:Class rdf:ID="c"/>
<first:r rdf:ID="i">
<rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Thing"/>
</first:r>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Lite |
Conclusions: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xmlns:first="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/allValuesFrom/premises002#"
xmlns:second="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/allValuesFrom/nonconclusions002#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/allValuesFrom/nonconclusions002" >
<owl:Thing rdf:about="premises002#i">
<first:p>
<first:c rdf:nodeID="o" />
</first:p>
</owl:Thing>
<owl:Thing rdf:nodeID="o" />
</rdf:RDF> |
| Lite |
Positive Entailment Test: |
001 |
| Description:
|
| Disjoint classes have different
members. |
| Lite |
Premises: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xmlns:first="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/disjointWith/premises001#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/disjointWith/premises001" >
<owl:Class rdf:ID="A">
<owl:disjointWith>
<owl:Class rdf:ID="B"/>
</owl:disjointWith>
</owl:Class>
<first:A rdf:ID="a"/>
<owl:Thing rdf:about="#a"/>
<first:B rdf:ID="b"/>
<owl:Thing rdf:about="#b"/>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Lite |
Conclusions: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02?22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xmlns:first="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/disjointWith/premises001#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/disjointWith/conclusions001" >
<owl:Thing rdf:about="premises001#a">
<owl:differentFrom>
<owl:Thing rdf:about="premises001#b"/>
</owl:differentFrom>
</owl:Thing>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
002 |
| Description:
|
| Disjoint classes have different
members; OWL Full. |
| Full |
Premises: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xmlns:first="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/disjointWith/premises002#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/disjointWith/premises002" >
<rdf:Description rdf:ID="A">
<owl:disjointWith>
<rdf:Description rdf:ID="B"/>
</owl:disjointWith>
</rdf:Description>
<first:A rdf:ID="a"/>
<first:B rdf:ID="b"/>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Conclusions: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/disjointWith/conclusions002" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="premises002#a">
<owl:differentFrom rdf:resource="premises002#b"/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Import Entailment Test: |
001 |
| Description:
|
| If a document imports another
document, then it entails anything that is entailed by the conjunction of
the two documents. |
| Full |
http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/premises001 |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf='http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#'
xmlns:rdfs='http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#'
xmlns:owl='http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#'
xmlns:ont='http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/support001-A#'
xml:base='http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/premises001' >
<rdf:Description rdf:about=''>
<owl:imports rdf:resource='http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/support001-A.rdf'/>
</rdf:Description>
<ont:Man rdf:about='http://example.org/data#Socrates'/>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Lite |
Imported Premises |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf='http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#'
xmlns:rdfs='http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#'
xmlns:owl='http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#'
xml:base='http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/support001-A' >
<owl:Ontology rdf:about=''/>
<owl:Class rdf:ID='Man'>
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource='#Mortal'/>
</owl:Class>
<owl:Class rdf:ID='Mortal'/>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/conclusions001 |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf='http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#'
xmlns:rdfs='http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#'
xmlns:owl='http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#'
xml:base='http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/conclusions001' >
<rdf:Description rdf:about='http://example.org/data#Socrates'>
<rdf:type rdf:resource='http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/support001-A#Mortal'/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Negative Entailment Test: |
002 |
| Description:
|
| If a premise document uses a namespace
but does not import the document corresponding to the namespace, then the
premises do not necessarily entail anything that is entailed by the
conjunction of the two documents. |
| Full |
Premises: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf='http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#'
xmlns:rdfs='http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#'
xmlns:owl='http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#'
xmlns:ont='http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/support002-A#'
xml:base='http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/premises002' >
<ont:Man rdf:about='http://example.org/data#Socrates'/>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Conclusions: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf='http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#'
xmlns:rdfs='http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#'
xmlns:owl='http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#'
xml:base='http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/conclusions002' >
<rdf:Description rdf:about='http://example.org/data#Socrates'>
<rdf:type rdf:resource='http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/support002-A#Mortal'/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Import Entailment Test: |
003 |
| Description:
|
| If a document imports a document which
in turn imports a third document, then it entails anything which is
entailed by the conjunction of the statements from the three documents.
That is, imports is transitive. |
| Full |
http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/premises003 |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf='http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#'
xmlns:rdfs='http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#'
xmlns:owl='http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#'
xmlns:ont='http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/support003-A#'
xml:base='http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/premises003' >
<rdf:Description rdf:about=''>
<owl:imports rdf:resource='http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/support003-A.rdf'/>
</rdf:Description>
<ont:Man rdf:about='http://example.org/data#Socrates'/>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Lite |
Imported Premises |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf='http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#'
xmlns:rdfs='http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#'
xmlns:owl='http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#'
xml:base='http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/support003-A' >
<owl:Ontology rdf:about=''>
<owl:imports rdf:resource='http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/support003-B.rdf'/>
</owl:Ontology>
<owl:Class rdf:ID='Man'>
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource='#Person'/>
</owl:Class>
<owl:Class rdf:ID='Person'/>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Lite |
Imported Premises |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf='http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#'
xmlns:rdfs='http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#'
xmlns:owl='http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#'
xml:base='http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/support003-B' >
<owl:Ontology rdf:about=''/>
<owl:Class rdf:about='http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/support003-A#Person'>
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource='#Mortal'/>
</owl:Class>
<owl:Class rdf:ID='Mortal'/>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/conclusions003 |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf='http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#'
xmlns:rdfs='http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#'
xmlns:owl='http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#'
xml:base='http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/conclusions003' >
<rdf:Description rdf:about='http://example.org/data#Socrates'>
<rdf:type rdf:resource='http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/support003-B#Mortal'/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
001 |
| Description:
|
The order of the classes in an
intersectionOf construct is unimportant. |
| Full |
Premises: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xmlns:first="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/intersectionOf/premises001#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/intersectionOf/premises001" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="premises001#B">
<owl:intersectionOf rdf:parseType="Collection">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="premises001#Student"/>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="premises001#Employee"/>
</owl:intersectionOf>
</rdf:Description>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="premises001#C">
<owl:intersectionOf rdf:parseType="Collection">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="premises001#Employee"/>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="premises001#Student"/>
</owl:intersectionOf>
</rdf:Description>
<first:B rdf:about="premises001#John">
</first:B>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Conclusions: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:first="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/intersectionOf/premises001#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/intersectionOf/conclusions001" >
<first:C rdf:about="premises001#John">
</first:C>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Inconsistent document. |
001 |
| Description:
|
| A property with maximum cardinality of
two cannot take three distinct values on some subject node. |
| Full |
Inconsistent: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xmlns:first="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/maxCardinality/inconsistent001#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/maxCardinality/inconsistent001" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="inconsistent001#sb1">
<rdf:type rdf:parseType="Resource">
<rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction"/>
<owl:maxCardinality
rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#nonNegativeInteger"
>2</owl:maxCardinality>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="inconsistent001#prop"/>
</rdf:type>
<first:prop rdf:resource="inconsistent001#ob1"/>
<first:prop rdf:resource="inconsistent001#ob2"/>
<first:prop rdf:resource="inconsistent001#ob3"/>
</rdf:Description>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="inconsistent001#ob1">
<owl:differentIndividualF?om rdf:resource="inconsistent001#ob2"/>
<owl:differentIndividualFrom rdf:resource="inconsistent001#ob3"/>
</rdf:Description>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="inconsistent001#ob2">
<owl:differentIndividualFrom rdf:resource="inconsistent001#ob3"/>
</rdf:Description>
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="inconsistent001#prop"/>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Inconsistent document. |
002 |
| Description:
|
| A property with maximum cardinality of
two cannot take three distinct values on some subject node. In this
example, one of the three values is implicit. |
| Full |
Inconsistent: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xmlns:first="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/maxCardinality/inconsistent002#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/maxCardinality/inconsistent002" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="inconsistent002#sb1">
<rdf:type rdf:parseType="Resource">
<rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Restriction"/>
<owl:maxCardinality>2</owl:maxCardinality>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="inconsistent002#prop"/>
</rdf:type>
<first:prop rdf:resource="inconsistent002#ob1"/>
<first:prop rdf:resource="inconsistent002#ob2"/>
<first:otherprop rdf:resource="inconsistent002#ob3"/>
</rdf:Description>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="inconsistent002#ob1">
<owl:differentIndividualFrom rdf:resource="inconsistent002#ob2"/>
<owl:differentIndividualFrom rdf:resource="inconsistent002#ob3"/>
</rdf:Description>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="inconsistent002#ob2">
<owl:differentIndividualFrom rdf:resource="inconsistent002#ob3"/>
</rdf:Description>
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="inconsistent002#prop"/>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="inconsistent002#otherprop">
<rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="inconsistent002#prop"/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Consistent document. |
001 |
| Description:
|
oneOf does not
indicate that the named individuals are distinct. Thus a consistent
interpretation of this file is when all the individual names denote the
same ind?vidual. |
| Full |
Consistent: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xmlns:first="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/oneOf/consistent001#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/oneOf/consistent001" >
<owl:Class>
<owl:oneOf rdf:parseType="Collection">
<rdf:Description rdf:ID="amy"/>
<rdf:Description rdf:ID="bob"/>
<rdf:Description rdf:ID="caroline"/>
</owl:oneOf>
<owl:sameClassAs>
<owl:Class>
<owl:oneOf rdf:parseType="Collection">
<rdf:Description rdf:ID="yolanda"/>
<rdf:Description rdf:ID="zebedee"/>
</owl:oneOf>
</owl:Class>
</owl:sameClassAs>
</owl:Class>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
001 |
| Description:
|
| A simple example. |
| Full |
Premises: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xmlns:first="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/someValuesFrom/premises001#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/someValuesFrom/premises001" >
<owl:Class rdf:ID="r">
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="#p"/>
<owl:someValuesFrom rdf:resource="#c"/>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
</owl:Class>
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:ID="p"/>
<owl:Class rdf:ID="c"/>
<first:r rdf:ID="i"/>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Conclusions: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xmlns:first="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/someValuesFrom/premises001#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/someValuesFrom/conclusions001" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="premises001#i">
<first:p>
<first:c />
</first:p>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Negative Entailment Test: |
002 |
| Description:
|
| See allValuesFrom |
| Full |
Premises: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xmlns:first="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/someValuesFrom/premises002#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/someValuesFrom/premises002" >
<owl:Class rdf:ID="r">
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="#p"/>
<owl:someValuesFrom rdf:resource="#c"/>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
</owl:Class>
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:ID="p"/>
<owl:Class rdf:ID="c"/>
<first:r rdf:ID="i">
<first:p rdf:resource="#o"/>
</first:r>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Conclusions: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:first="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/someValuesFrom/premises002#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/someValuesFrom/conclusions002" >
<first:c rdf:about="premises001#o"/>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
001 |
| Description:
|
| A union is a superclass of its
parts. |
| Full |
Premises: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xmlns:first="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/unionOf/premises001#"
xmlns:second="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/unionOf/conclusions001#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/unionOf/premises001" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="premises001#A">
<owl:unionOf rdf:parseType="Collection">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="premises001#Human"/>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="premises001#Animal"/>
</owl:unionOf>
</rdf:Description>
<first:Human rdf:about="premises001#John">
</first:Human>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Conclusions: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xmlns:first="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/unionOf/premises001#"
xmlns:second="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/unionOf/conclusions001#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/unionOf/conclusions001" >
<first:A rdf:about="premises001#John">
</first:A>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
002 |
| Description:
|
| A union behaves quite like set
theoretic union. |
| Full |
Premises: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xmlns:first="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/unionOf/premises002#"
xmlns:second="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/unionOf/conclusions002#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/unionOf/premises002" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="premises002#A">
<owl:unionOf rdf:parseType="Collection">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="premises002#Human"/>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="premises002#Animal"/>
</owl:unionOf>
</rdf:Description>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="premises002#B">
<owl:unionOf rdf:parseType="Collection">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="premises002#Animal"/>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="premises002#Human"/>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="premises002#Stone"/>
</owl:unionOf>
</rdf:Description>
<first:A rdf:about="premises002#John">
</first:A>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Conclusions: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xmlns:first="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/unionOf/premises002#"
xmlns:second="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/unionOf/conclusions002#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/unionOf/conclusions002" >
<first:B rdf:about="premises002#John">
</first:B>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Lite |
Illegal use of OWL namespace. |
001 |
| Description:
|
This is not legal OWL. The name
UnambiguousProperty is not in the OWL namespace.
daml:UnambiguousProperty corresponds to
owl:InverseFunctionalProperty. |
| Lite |
Incorrect: |
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:owl ="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" >
<owl:UnambiguousProperty rdf:ID="Name"/>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Lite |
Illegal use of OWL namespace. |
001 |
| Description:
|
This is not legal OWL. The name
UniqueProperty is not in the OWL namespace.
daml:UniqueProperty corresponds to
owl:FunctionalProperty. |
| Lite |
Incorrect: |
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:owl ="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" >
<owl:UniqueProperty rdf:ID="Name"/>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
001 |
| Description:
|
| stateCode example using an
inverseFunctionalProperty and literals |
| Full |
Premises: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf='http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#'
xmlns:NS0='http://example.org/vocab#'
>
<rdf:Description rdf:nodeID='A0'>
<NS0:stateCode>KS</NS0:stateCode>
<NS0:population>2688418</NS0:population>
</rdf:Description>
<rdf:Description rdf:about='http://example.org/vocab#stateCode'>
<rdf:type rdf:resource='http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#InverseFunctionalProperty'/>
</rdf:Description>
<rdf:Description rdf:nodeID='A1'>
<NS0:stateCode>KS</NS0:stateCode>
<NS0:stateBird rdf:resource='http://example.org/vocab#WesternMeadowlark'/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Conclusions: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf='http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#'
xmlns:NS0='http://example.org/vocab#'
>
<rdf:Description rdf:nodeID='A0'>
<NS0:population>2688418</NS0:population>
<NS0:stateBird rdf:resource='http://example.org/vocab#WesternMeadowlark'/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
001 |
| Description:
|
| This entailment is similar to one that
does not hold in RDFS. |
| Full |
Premises: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/I5.3/premises001" >
<rdf:Property rdf:ID="prop">
<rdfs:range>
<owl:Class rdf:ID="A">
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Class rdf:ID="B"/>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
</owl:Class>
</rdfs:range>
</rdf:Property>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Conclusions: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/I5.3/conclusions001" >
<rdf:Property rdf:about="premises001#prop">
<rdfs:range>
<owl:Class rdf:about="premises001#B"/>
</rdfs:range>
</rdf:Property>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
002 |
| Description:
|
| OWL, unlike RDFS, uses iff semantics
for range. |
| Full |
Premises: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/I5.3/premises002" >
<rdf:Property rdf:ID="prop">
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="#A"/>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="#B"/>
</rdf:Property>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Conclusions: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/I5.3/conclusions002" >
<rdf:Property rdf:about="premises002#prop">
<rdfs:range>
<owl:Class>
<owl:intersectionOf rdf:parseType="Collection">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="premises002#A"/>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="premises002#B"/>
</owl:intersectionOf>
</owl:Class>
</rdfs:range>
</rdf:Property>
</rdf:RDF> |
?
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
003 |
| Description:
|
| This is a typical definition of range
from description logic. |
| Full |
Premises: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/I5.3/premises003" >
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:ID="prop">
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="#A"/>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Conclusions: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/I5.3/conclusions003" >
<owl:Thing>
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="premises003#prop"/>
<owl:allValuesFrom rdf:resource="premises003#A"/>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
</owl:Thing>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
004 |
| Description:
|
| This is a typical definition of range
from description logic. It works both ways. |
| Full |
Premises: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/I5.3/premises004" >
<owl:Thing>
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="conclusions004#prop"/>
<owl:allValuesFrom>
<owl:Class rdf:resource="conclusions004#A"/>
</owl:allValuesFrom>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
</owl:Thing>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Conclusions: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/I5.3/conclusions004" >
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:ID="prop">
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="#A"/>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
001 |
| Description:
|
| rdf:first is a
FunctionalProperty. |
| Full |
Premises: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" >
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Conclusions: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" >
<owl:FunctionalProperty rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first" />
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
002 |
| Description:
|
| rdf:rest is a
FunctionalProperty. |
| Full |
Premises: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" >
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Conclusions: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" >
<owl:FunctionalProperty rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest" />
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Inconsistent document. |
003 |
| Description:
|
| rdf:nil cannot have an rdf:rest
property. |
| Full |
Inconsistent: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/I5.5/inconsistent003" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil">
<rdf:rest>
<rdf:Description />
</rdf:rest>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF> |
| Full |
Inconsistent document. |
004 |
| Description:
|
| rdf:nil cannot have an rdf:first
property. |
| Full |
Inconsistent: |
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/I5.5/inconsistent003" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil">
<rdf:first>
<rdf:Description />
</rdf:first>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF> |
This section repeats the tests of the previous section.
The following namespace prefixes are used throughout:
rdf
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
rdfs
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
owl
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
first
- The URL of the first file concatenated with
#
second
- The URL of the second file concatenated with
#
In the N3 syntax [N3] used for namespace declarations,
the first three appear as follows:
| Namespaces: |
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
|
Other namespaces are explicitly listed with the test data.
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
003 |
| Description:
|
If prop is an
owl:FunctionalProperty, then its inverse is an
owl:InverseFunctionalProperty. |
| Full |
Premises: |
first:prop rdf:type owl:FunctionalProperty .
first:prop owl:inverseOf first:inv .
|
| Full |
Conclusions: |
first:inv rdf:type owl:InverseFunctionalProperty .
|
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
004 |
| Description:
|
If the range of prop is a
singleton set then it is necessarily functional, (i.e. every member of its
domain has a single value) and so it is an
owl:FunctionalProperty. |
| Full |
Premises: |
first:prop rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty .
first:prop rdfs:range first:Singleton .
first:Singleton rdf:type rdfs:Class .
_:jARP2267 rdf:first _:jARP2268 .
_:jARP2267 rdf:rest rdf:nil .
_:jARP2267 rdf:type rdf:List .
first:Singleton owl:oneOf _:jARP2267 .
|
| Full |
Conclusions: |
first:prop rdf:type owl:FunctionalProperty .
|
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
005 |
| Description:
|
If prop belongs to
owl:FunctionalProperty then an OWL object has at most one
value for prop. |
| Namespaces: |
@prefix eg: <http://www.example.org/> .
|
| Full |
Premises: |
eg:foo#prop rdf:type owl:FunctionalProperty .
eg:foo#object rdf:type owl:Thing .
|
| Full |
Conclusions: |
eg:foo#object rdf:type owl:Thing .
_:jARP2273 rdf:type owl:Restriction .
eg:foo#prop rdf:type owl:FunctionalProperty .
_:jARP2273 owl:onProperty eg:foo#prop .
_:jARP2273 owl:maxCardinality "1"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#nonNegativeInteger> .
eg:foo#object rdf:type _:jARP2273 .
|
| Errors: |
Incorrect description in conclusions005.
If prop belongs to owl:FunctionalProperty then an OWL object
has at most one value for prop. If prop belongs to
owl:FunctionalProperty then an OWL object has at most one
value for prop.
|
? | Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
003 |
| Description:
|
If prop is an
owl:InverseFunctionalProperty, then its inverse is an
owl:FunctionalProperty. |
| Full |
Premises: |
first:prop rdf:type owl:InverseFunctionalProperty .
first:prop owl:inverseOf first:inv .
|
| Full |
Conclusions: |
first:inv rdf:type owl:FunctionalProperty .
|
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
004 |
| Description:
|
If the domain of prop is
a singleton set then it is necessarily inverse functional, (i.e. every
member of its range is the value of a single item) so it is an
owl:InverseFunctionalProperty. |
| Full |
Premises: |
first:prop rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty .
first:prop rdfs:domain first:Singleton .
first:Singleton rdf:type rdfs:Class .
_:jARP2281 rdf:first _:jARP2282 .
_:jARP2281 rdf:rest rdf:nil .
_:jARP2281 rdf:type rdf:List .
first:Singleton owl:oneOf _:jARP2281 .
|
| Full |
Conclusions: |
first:prop rdf:type owl:InverseFunctionalProperty .
|
| Full |
Inconsistent document. |
001 |
| Description:
|
The triple asserts something of type
Nothing, however that is the empty class. |
| Full |
Inconsistent: |
_:jARP2284 rdf:type owl:Nothing .
|
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
002 |
| Description:
|
There is one empty
owl:Class, and it is often called Nothing. |
| Full |
Premises: |
|
| Full |
Conclusions: |
_:jARP2285 rdf:type owl:Class .
_:jARP2285 owl:oneOf rdf:nil .
_:jARP2285 owl:sameClassAs owl:Nothing .
|
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
001 |
| Description:
|
| A simple illustration of
transitivity. |
| Full |
Premises: |
first:Antwerp first:path first:Amsterdam .
first:Ghent first:path first:Antwerp .
first:path rdf:type owl:TransitiveProperty .
|
| Full |
Conclusions: |
first:Ghent first:path first:Amsterdam .
|
| Lite |
Positive Entailment Test: |
001 |
| Description:
|
| A simple example. |
| Lite |
Premises: |
first:r rdf:type owl:Class .
_:jARP2295 rdf:type owl:Restriction .
_:jARP2295 owl:onProperty first:p .
_:jARP2295 owl:allValuesFrom first:c .
first:r rdfs:subClassOf _:jARP2295 .
first:p rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty .
first:p rdfs:range owl:Thing .
first:p rdfs:domain owl:Thing .
first:c rdf:type owl:Class .
first:i rdf:type first:r .
first:i rdf:type owl:Thing .
first:o rdf:type owl:Thing .
first:i first:p first:o .
|
| Lite |
Conclusions: |
first:o rdf:type first:c .
first:o rdf:type owl:Thing .
|
| Lite |
Negative Entailment Test: |
002 |
| Description:
|
| See someValuesFrom. |
| Lite |
Premises: |
first:r rdf:type owl:Class .
_:jARP2308 rdf:type owl:Restriction .
_:jARP2308 owl:onProperty first:p .
_:jARP2308 owl:allValuesFrom first:c .
first:r rdfs:subClassOf _:jARP2308 .
first:p rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty .
first:p rdfs:range owl:Thing .
first:p rdfs:domain owl:Thing .
first:c rdf:type owl:Class .
first:i rdf:type first:r .
first:i rdf:type owl:Thing .
|
| Lite |
Conclusions: |
first:i rdf:type owl:Thing .
_:jo rdf:type first:c .
first:i first:p _:jo .
_:jo rdf:type owl:Thing .
|
| Lite |
Positive Entailment Test: |
001 |
| Description:
|
| Disjoint classes have different
members. |
| Lite |
Premises: |
first:A rdf:type owl:Class .
first:B rdf:type owl:Class .
first:A owl:disjointWith first:B .
first:a rdf:type first:A .
first:a rdf:type owl:Thing .
first:b rdf:type first:B .
first:b rdf:type owl:Thing .
|
| Lite |
Conclusions: |
first:a rdf:type owl:Thing .
first:b rdf:type owl:Thing .
first:a owl:differentFrom first:b .
|
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
002 |
| Description:
|
| Disjoint classes have different
members; OWL Full. |
| Full |
Premises: |
first:A owl:disjointWith first:B .
first:a rdf:type first:A .
first:b rdf:type first:B .
|
| Full |
Conclusions: |
first:a owl:differentFrom first:b .
|
| Full |
Import Entailment Test: |
001 |
| Description:
|
| If a document imports another
document, then it entails anything that is entailed by the conjunction of
the two documents. |
| Namespaces: |
@prefix ont: <http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/support001-A#> .
|
| Full |
http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/premises001 |
<http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/premises001> owl:imports <http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/support001-A.rdf> .
<http://example.org/data#Socrates> rdf:type ont:Man .
|
| Lite |
Imported Premises |
<http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/support001-A> rdf:type owl:Ontology .
ont:Man rdf:type owl:Class .
ont:Man rdfs:subClassOf ont:Mortal .
ont:Mortal rdf:type owl:Class .
|
| Full |
http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/conclusions001 |
<http://example.org/data#Socrates> rdf:type ont:Mortal .
|
| Errors: |
Can the suffix be removed from
<http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/support001-A.rdf>?
|
| Full |
Negative Entailment Test: |
002 |
| Description:
|
| If a premise document uses a namespace
but does not import the document corresponding to the namespace, then the
premises do not necessarily entail anything that is entailed by the
conjunction of the two documents. |
| Namespaces: |
@prefix ont: <http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/support002-A#> .
|
| Full |
Premises: |
<http://example.org/data#Socrates> rdf:type ont:Man .
|
| Full |
Conclusions: |
<http://example.org/data#Socrates> rdf:type ont:Mortal .
|
| Full |
Import Entailment Test: |
003 |
| Description:
|
| If a document imports a document which
in turn imports a third document, then it entails anything which is
entailed by the conjunction of the statements from the three documents.
That is, imports is transitive. |
| Namespaces: |
@prefix ont: <http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/support003-A#> .
|
| Full |
http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/premises003 |
<http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/premises003> owl:imports <http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/support003-A.rdf> .
<http://example.org/data#Socrates> rdf:type ont:Man .
|
| Lite |
Imported Premises |
<http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/support003-A> rdf:type owl:Ontology .
<http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/support003-A> owl:imports <http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/support003-B.rdf> .
ont:Man rdf:type owl:Class .
ont:Man rdfs:subClassOf ont:Person .
ont:Person rdf:type owl:Class .
|
| Lite |
Imported Premises |
<http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/support003-B> rdf:type owl:Ontology .
ont:Person rdf:type owl:Class .
ont:Person rdfs:subClassOf <http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/support003-B#Mortal> .
<http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/support003-B#Mortal> rdf:type owl:Class .
|
| Full |
http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/conclusions003 |
<http://example.org/data#Socrates> rdf:type <http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/support003-B#Mortal> .
|
| Errors: |
Incorrect description in support003-A.
If a document imports another document, then it entails anything that is
entailed by the conjunction of the two documents. If a document imports a
document which in turn imports a third document, then it entails anything
which is entailed by the conjunction of the statements from the three
documents. That is, imports is transitive.
Can the suffix be removed
from <http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/support003-B.rdf>?
Can the suffix be removed from
<http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/support003-A.rdf>?
|
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
001 |
| Description:
|
The order of the classes in an
intersectionOf construct is unimportant. |
| Full |
Premises: |
_:jARP2363 rdf:first first:Employee .
_:jARP2363 rdf:rest rdf:nil .
_:jARP2363 rdf:type rdf:List .
_:jARP2361 rdf:first first:Student .
_:jARP2361 rdf:rest _:jARP2363 .
_:jARP2361 rdf:type rdf:List .
first:B owl:intersectionOf _:jARP2361 .
_:jARP2368 rdf:first first:Student .
_:jARP2368 rdf:rest rdf:nil .
_:jARP2368 rdf:type rdf:List .
_:jARP2366 rdf:first first:Employee .
_:jARP2366 rdf:rest _:jARP2368 .
_:jARP2366 rdf:type rdf:List .
first:C owl:intersectionOf _:jARP2366 .
first:John rdf:type first:B .
|
| Full |
Conclusions: |
first:John rdf:type first:C .
|
| Full |
Inconsistent document. |
001 |
| Description:
|
| A property with maximum cardinality of
two cannot take three distinct values on some subject node. |
| Full |
Inconsistent: |
_:jARP2373 rdf:type owl:Restriction .
_:jARP2373 owl:maxCardinality "2"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#nonNegativeInteger> .
_:jARP2373 owl:onProperty first:prop .
first:sb1 rdf:type _:jARP2373 .
first:sb1 first:prop first:ob1 .
first:sb1 first:prop first:ob2 .
first:sb1 first:prop first:ob3 .
first:ob1 owl:differentIndividualFrom first:ob2 .
first:ob1 owl:differentIndividualFrom first:ob3 .
first:ob2 owl:differentIndividualFrom first:ob3 .
first:prop rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty .
|
| Full |
Inconsistent document. |
002 |
| Description:
|
| A property with maximum cardinality of
two cannot take three distinct values on some subject node. In this
example, one of the three values is implicit. |
| Full |
Inconsistent: |
_:jARP2386 rdf:type owl:Restriction .
_:jARP2386 owl:maxCardinality "2" .
_:jARP2386 owl:onProperty first:prop .
first:sb1 rdf:type _:jARP2386 .
first:sb1 first:prop first:ob1 .
first:sb1 first:prop first:ob2 .
first:sb1 first:otherprop first:ob3 .
first:ob1 owl:differentIndividualFrom first:ob2 .
first:ob1 owl:differentIndividualFrom firs?:ob3 .
first:ob2 owl:differentIndividualFrom first:ob3 .
first:prop rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty .
first:otherprop rdfs:subPropertyOf first:prop .
|
| Full |
Consistent document. |
001 |
| Description:
|
oneOf does not
indicate that the named individuals are distinct. Thus a consistent
interpretation of this file is when all the individual names denote the
same individual. |
| Full |
Consistent: |
_:jARP2400 rdf:type owl:Class .
_:jARP2405 rdf:first first:caroline .
_:jARP2405 rdf:rest rdf:nil .
_:jARP2405 rdf:type rdf:List .
_:jARP2403 rdf:first first:bob .
_:jARP2403 rdf:rest _:jARP2405 .
_:jARP2403 rdf:type rdf:List .
_:jARP2401 rdf:first first:amy .
_:jARP2401 rdf:rest _:jARP2403 .
_:jARP2401 rdf:type rdf:List .
_:jARP2400 owl:oneOf _:jARP2401 .
_:jARP2407 rdf:type owl:Class .
_:jARP2410 rdf:first first:zebedee .
_:jARP2410 rdf:rest rdf:nil .
_:jARP2410 rdf:type rdf:List .
_:jARP2408 rdf:first first:yolanda .
_:jARP2408 rdf:rest _:jARP2410 .
_:jARP2408 rdf:type rdf:List .
_:jARP2407 owl:oneOf _:jARP2408 .
_:jARP2400 owl:sameClassAs _:jARP2407 .
|
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
001 |
| Description:
|
| A simple example. |
| Full |
Premises: |
first:r rdf:type owl:Class .
_:jARP2413 rdf:type owl:Restriction .
_:jARP2413 owl:onProperty first:p .
_:jARP2413 owl:someValuesFrom first:c .
first:r rdfs:subClassOf _:jARP2413 .
first:p rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty .
first:c rdf:type owl:Class .
first:i rdf:type first:r .
|
| Full |
Conclusions: |
_:jARP2420 rdf:type first:c .
first:i first:p _:jARP2420 .
|
| Full |
Negative Entailment Test: |
002 |
| Description:
|
| See allValuesFrom |
| Fu?l |
Premises: |
first:r rdf:type owl:Class .
_:jARP2422 rdf:type owl:Restriction .
_:jARP2422 owl:onProperty first:p .
_:jARP2422 owl:someValuesFrom first:c .
first:r rdfs:subClassOf _:jARP2422 .
first:p rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty .
first:c rdf:type owl:Class .
first:i rdf:type first:r .
first:i first:p first:o .
|
| Full |
Conclusions: |
<http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/someValuesFrom/premises001#o> rdf:type first:c .
|
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
001 |
| Description:
|
| A union is a superclass of its
parts. |
| Full |
Premises: |
_:jARP2433 rdf:first first:Animal .
_:jARP2433 rdf:rest rdf:nil .
_:jARP2433 rdf:type rdf:List .
_:jARP2431 rdf:first first:Human .
_:jARP2431 rdf:rest _:jARP2433 .
_:jARP2431 rdf:type rdf:List .
first:A owl:unionOf _:jARP2431 .
first:John rdf:type first:Human .
|
| Full |
Conclusions: |
first:John rdf:type first:A .
|
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
002 |
| Description:
|
| A union behaves quite like set
theoretic union. |
| Full |
Premises: |
_:jARP2440 rdf:first first:Animal .
_:jARP2440 rdf:rest rdf:nil .
_:jARP2440 rdf:type rdf:List .
_:jARP2438 rdf:first first:Human .
_:jARP2438 rdf:rest _:jARP2440 .
_:jARP2438 rdf:type rdf:List .
first:A owl:unionOf _:jARP2438 .
_:jARP2447 rdf:first first:Stone .
_:jARP2447 rdf:rest rdf:nil .
_:jARP2447 rdf:type rdf:List .
_:jARP2445 rdf:first first:Human .
_:jARP2445 rdf:rest _:jARP2447 .
_:jARP2445 rdf:type rdf:List .
_:jARP2443 rdf:first first:Animal .
_:jARP2443 rdf:rest _:jARP2445 .
_:jARP2443 rdf:type rdf:List .
first:B owl:unionOf _:jARP2443 .
first:John rdf:type first:A .
|
| Full |
Conclusions: |
first:John rdf:type first:B .
|
| Lite |
Illegal use of OWL namespace. |
001 |
| Description:
|
This is not legal OWL. The name
UnambiguousProperty is not in the OWL namespace.
daml:UnambiguousProperty corresponds to
owl:InverseFunctionalProperty. |
| Lite |
Incorrect: |
first:Name rdf:type owl:UnambiguousProperty .
|
| Lite |
Illegal use of OWL namespace. |
001 |
| Description:
|
This is not legal OWL. The name
UniqueProperty is not in the OWL namespace.
daml:UniqueProperty corresponds to
owl:FunctionalProperty. |
| Lite |
Incorrect: |
first:Name rdf:type owl:UniqueProperty .
|
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
001 |
| Description:
|
| stateCode example using an
inverseFunctionalProperty and literals |
| Namespaces: |
@prefix NS0: <http://example.org/vocab#> .
|
| Full |
Premises: |
_:jA0 NS0:stateCode "KS" .
_:jA0 NS0:population "2688418" .
NS0:stateCode rdf:type owl:InverseFunctionalProperty .
_:jA1 NS0:stateCode "KS" .
_:jA1 NS0:stateBird NS0:WesternMeadowlark .
|
| Full |
Conclusions: |
_:jA0 NS0:population "2688418" .
_:jA0 NS0:stateBird NS0:WesternMeadowl?rk .
|
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
001 |
| Description:
|
| This entailment is similar to one that
does not hold in RDFS. |
| Full |
Premises: |
first:prop rdf:type rdf:Property .
first:A rdf:type owl:Class .
first:B rdf:type owl:Class .
first:A rdfs:subClassOf first:B .
first:prop rdfs:range first:A .
|
| Full |
Conclusions: |
first:prop rdf:type rdf:Property .
first:B rdf:type owl:Class .
first:prop rdfs:range first:B .
|
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
002 |
| Description:
|
| OWL, unlike RDFS, uses iff semantics
for range. |
| Full |
Premises: |
first:prop rdf:type rdf:Property .
first:prop rdfs:range first:A .
first:prop rdfs:range first:B .
|
| Full |
Conclusions: |
first:prop rdf:type rdf:Property .
_:jARP2469 rdf:type owl:Class .
_:jARP2472 rdf:first first:B .
_:jARP2472 rdf:rest rdf:nil .
_:jARP2472 rdf:type rdf:List .
_:jARP2470 rdf:first first:A .
_:jARP2470 rdf:rest _:jARP2472 .
_:jARP2470 rdf:type rdf:List .
_:jARP2469 owl:intersectionOf _:jARP2470 .
first:prop rdfs:range _:jARP2469 .
|
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
003 |
| Description:
|
| This is a typical definition of range
from description logic. |
| Full |
Premises: |
first:prop rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty .
first:prop rdfs:range first:A .
|
| Full |
Conclusions: |
_:jARP2476 rdf:type owl:Thing .
_:jARP2?77 rdf:type owl:Restriction .
_:jARP2477 owl:onProperty first:prop .
_:jARP2477 owl:allValuesFrom first:A .
_:jARP2476 rdfs:subClassOf _:jARP2477 .
|
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
004 |
| Description:
|
| This is a typical definition of range
from description logic. It works both ways. |
| Full |
Premises: |
_:jARP2480 rdf:type owl:Thing .
_:jARP2481 rdf:type owl:Restriction .
_:jARP2481 owl:onProperty second:prop .
_:jARP2483 rdf:type owl:Class .
_:jARP2481 owl:allValuesFrom _:jARP2483 .
_:jARP2480 rdfs:subClassOf _:jARP2481 .
|
| Full |
Conclusions: |
second:prop rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty .
second:prop rdfs:range second:A .
|
| Errors: |
http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/I5.3/premises004[30:60]: {E201}
Syntax error when processing attribute rdf:resource. Cannot have attribute
rdf:resource in this context.
|
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
001 |
| Description:
|
| rdf:first is a
FunctionalProperty. |
| Full |
Premises: |
|
| Full |
Conclusions: |
rdf:first rdf:type owl:FunctionalProperty .
|
| Full |
Positive Entailment Test: |
002 |
| Description:
|
| rdf:rest is a
FunctionalProperty. |
| Full |
Premises: |
|
| Full |
Conclusions: |
| rdf:rest rdf:type owl:FunctionalProperty .
|
| Full |
Inconsistent document. |
003 |
| Description:
|
| rdf:nil cannot have an rdf:rest
property. |
| Full |
Inconsistent: |
rdf:nil rdf:rest _:jARP2489 .
|
| Full |
Inconsistent document. |
004 |
| Description:
|
| rdf:nil cannot have an rdf:first
property. |
| Full |
Inconsistent: |
rdf:nil rdf:first _:jARP2491 .
|
Most of these issues will be ignored.
Unimplemented - non trivial ManifestLoader.getText()
Jtidy
reported 214 warnings in webont-issues.
Jtidy reported 1 warnings in 03owlt/.
Can suffix be removed
from URI: false.rdf
Jtidy reported 7 errors in webont-issues.
Jtidy reported 1 warnings in qualified-cardinality-constraints/.
Jtidy reported 1 warnings in FunctionalProperty/.
Jtidy reported 1 warnings in I4.1/.
Jtidy reported 1
warnings in umlp/.
Can the descriptions of approved tests be quotes from other
(normative) documents?
Check descriptions for appropriate links to other OWL specs.
Add automatic checking of filenames.
Check erratum process against latest W3C process documents
(including those in active development).
OWL Lite tests may be flagged. (And other levels). Imports tests
may be flagged.
Conformance is not yet addressed.
Jeremy Carroll thanks Oreste Signore, his
host at the W3C Office in Italy and Istituto di Scienza e Tecnologie dell'Informazione
"Alessandro Faedo", part of the Consiglio
Nazionale delle Ricerche, where Jeremy is a visiting researcher.
- [OWL Abstract Syntax and
Semantics]
- Web
Ontology Language (OWL) Abstract Syntax and Semantics . Peter F.
Patel-Schneider, Patrick Hayes, Ian Horrocks, and Frank van Harmelen. W3C
Working Draft 08 November 2002. Latest version is available at
http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/.
- [OWL Language]
- OWL Web
Ontology Language 1.0 Reference. Mike Dean, Dan Connolly, Frank van
Harmelen, James Hendler, Ian Horrocks, Deborah L. McGuinness, Peter F.
Patel-Schneider, and Lynn Andrea Stein. W3C Working Draft 29 July 2002. Latest version is available at
http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/.
- [RDF/XML Syntax]
- RDF/XML
Syntax Specification (Revised). Dave Beckett, ed. W3C Working Draft
25 March 2002. Latest version is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/.
- [DAML+OIL]
- DAML+OIL
(March 2001) Reference Description. Dan Connolly, Frank van
Harmelen, Ian Horrocks, Deborah L. McGuinness, Peter F. Patel-Schneider, and
Lynn Andrea Stein. W3C Note 18 December 2001. Latest version is available at
http://www.w3.org/TR/daml+oil-reference.
- [Dublin Core]
- http://dublincore.org/documents/
- [N3]
- Primer: Getting
into RDF & Semantic Web using N3 Tim Berners-Lee, Dan Connolly
- [OWL Issues]
- Web
Ontology Issue Status. Michael K. Smith, ed. 10 Jul 2002.
- [RDF Test Cases]
- RDF Test
Cases, A. Barstow, D. Beckett, J. Grant, Editors. Work in progress.
World Wide Web Consortium, 15 November 2001. This version of the RDF Test
Cases is http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-rdf-testcases-20011115/. The latest version of the RDF Test
Cases is at http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-testcases/.
- [W3C CVS]
- Use of CVS in W3C
(member-only link). Henrik Frystyk Nielsen, Gerald Oskoboiny. 2002.
- [XHTML]
- XHTML 1.0:
The Extensible HyperText Markup Language, W3C Recommendation, S.
Pemberton et al., 26 January 2000.
Available
at: http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-xhtml1-20000126
- [XMLBASE]
- XML
Base, J. Marsh, Editor, W3C Recommendation. World Wide Web
Consortium, 2? June 2001. This version of XML Base is
http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlbase-20010627/. The latest version of XML Base is at
http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlbase/.
- [XP]
- Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change, Kent Beck. 5
Oct 1999. Addison-Wesley. ISBN 0201616416.
The following refs were not defined: