icon
indicates links to a demo page without WAI site navigation.
This page lists the main accessibility barriers in the "Before and After Demonstration" Web pages.
For an introduction to the demonstration, see About the Before and After Demonstration. For details on the
accessibility barriers in the demonstration, see the Web
Accessibility Evaluation Report.
The pages
of the demonstration Web pages werehave been developed
using templates to define the overall structure and visual design. Accessibility
barriers in the page templates are therefore automatically carried over to all
the other pages of the Web site. The Therefore, all the
demonstration Web pages have the same accessibility
barriers that are in the template. Each pages
also demonstrates other accessibility barriers in
addition to these carried over from the templates.
·
Images are missing text
equivalents - see Use of Images in the Evaluation
Report
·
Controls are not operable by
keyboard - see Keyboard Control in the Evaluation
Report
·
Page markup does not validate -
see Page Markup in the Evaluation Report
·
Client-side scripts are not
accessible - see Use of Scripts in the Evaluation
Report
·
Insufficient color contrast for
links - see Use of Color in the Evaluation Report
· Images do not have appropriate alternative text equivalents - see Use of Images in the Evaluation Report
· Reading order is distorted without style sheets - see Page Structure in the Evaluation Report
· Headings, lists, and list items are not coded/marked up properly - see Page Structure in the Evaluation Report
·
Ambiguous lLink texts are ambiguous, such
as "click here" are used - see Use
of Links in the Evaluation Report
·
Text may disappears in some browsers
when the font size is increased - see Page
Presentation in the Evaluation Report
Note: The layout of the inaccessible news article page breaks
in most browsers other than Internet Explorer 6. , tThis
demonstrates the effect of coding for a single browser.
· Reading order is distorted without style sheets - see Page Structure in the Evaluation Report
· Document code contains deprecated markup - see Page Markup in the Evaluation Report
· Quotation markup is used for formatting effects - see Page Structure in the Evaluation Report
·
Font sizes are fixed and may not be expandiable
- see Page Presentation in the Evaluation Report
·
Data tables do not contain sufficient markup
code - see Use of Tables in the Evaluation Report
· Data tables do not contain sufficient markup code - see Use of Tables in the Evaluation Report
· Data table markup is used for formatting effects - see Use of Tables in the Evaluation Report
· Acronyms and abbreviations are not explained - see Page Structure in the Evaluation Report
· Page headings are encoded as images of text - see Use of Images in the Evaluation Report
·
Invalid markup does not work on some browsers -
see Page Markup in the Evaluation Report
· Layout tables do not linearize to reading order - see Use of Tables in the Evaluation Report
· Form controls are not associated with labels - see Use of Forms in the Evaluation Report
· Form controls are not divided into manageable groups - see Use of Forms in the Evaluation Report
· Color-coded information is not available without color - see Use of Color in the Evaluation Report
·
Changes in the natural language are not indicated
- see Site Navigation in the Evaluation Report
·Images are
missing text equivalents - see Use of Images in the
Evaluation Report
·Controls are
not operable by keyboard - see Keyboard Control in
the Evaluation Report
·Page markup
does not validate - see Page Markup in the Evaluation
Report
·Client-side
scripts are not accessible - see Use of Scripts in
the Evaluation Report
·Insufficient
color contrast for links - see Use of Color in the
Evaluation Report