- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2026 17:57:14 +0000
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Functionally, both approaches are supposed to lead to the same end result (viewport width of 320 CSS px). What differences are you seeing? On 19/03/2026 17:38, Tumelaire, Justin wrote: > I hope all is well. I’m finding that different groups test 1.4.10 Reflow > using different methods: > > 1. Set width to 1280 px (for vertically scrolling content), zoom to > 400% and test > 2. Change the viewport to 320px without adjusting zoom and test > > In my experience, the results are different. What may create issues with > a loss of content using option 1 are not issues when testing using > option 2. Are both options acceptable for testing reflow? Does option 1 > catch a larger subset of potential issues? > > Thank you! > > Justin > -- Patrick H. Lauke * https://www.splintered.co.uk/ * https://github.com/patrickhlauke * https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ * https://mastodon.social/@patrick_h_lauke
Received on Thursday, 19 March 2026 17:57:21 UTC