Hey folks,
I published a series on EN 17161 Design For All, and why I believe that the
digital accessibility industry should embrace it as a partner standard to
WCAG. I think it can be the answer to some of the biggest challenges we've
been dealing with for the past two decades.
You can find the articles on LinkedIn:
- Design for all, part 1: WCAG isn't enough
<https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/design-all-part-1-wcag-isnt-enough-wilco-fiers-fikre/>
- Design for all, part 2: Mind the gaps
<https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/design-all-part-2-mind-gaps-wilco-fiers-cce0e/>
- Design for all, part 3: All or nothing
<https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/design-all-part-3-nothing-wilco-fiers-0wvbe/>
- Design for all, part 4: WCAG’s patient partner
<https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/design-all-part-4-wcags-patient-partner-wilco-fiers-83roe/>
I'm sending this to AGWG's mailing list because it closely relates to a
topic that was on our agenda two weeks ago. I'd love to get feedback,
but *please
don't CC reply to this email*. AGWG doesn't want long email discussions. If
you want to talk about it send me a direct message.
--
*Wilco Fiers*
Director accessibility automation - W3C AC representative - Facilitator ACT
Task Force
