There are the beginnings of image descriptions in
all fields. Try using Google's advanced search page
and type "image descriptions" (without the quotes) in the exact phrase
area.
There's more than I expected.
>>> "Hy Cohen" <hy@miplet.com> 02/18/02 02:06PM
>>>
Hi,
I know I would be greatly impressed if a so-called
"for sighted users only"
had descriptions of artwork, etc. I can come up
with a couple of examples
where someone who is blind would want to know what
was being presented.
First, let's say it is an art museum on the
Internet, and I'm in school and
need to do a report on a painting. Being as
I cannot see the painting, I
would need someone to describe it, so I could
do a good report. I also may
be interested in the styles and content of an
artist for my personal use.
Another example may be if I'm trying to find
a graphics designer for a
website I'm developing. A description of the
design including style, would
give me at least a starting point to know if I
want to have someone sighted
take a look at the art.
Warmly,
Hy
& Guide Dog, "Layla"
hy@miplet.com
-----Original Message-----
From:
w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [
mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org]On
Behalf Of Leslie K. Yoder
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 10:35 AM
To:
w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Subject: another alt question
I've read with great interest the
discussion regarding the purpose and
content of alt text. So far, the
emphasis has been on images that are
"decorative" or supplemental in some
way to the main content of a page.
My question is this: what if the
images _are_ the content--for example, a
photo gallery or artist's online
portfolio? My guess is that long desc
would be the way to go, but I'm not
sure.
I'm currently working up a site for a friend who is a graphic
artist (mostly
in the area of signage), and I've looked at several artists'
pages in the
process. I've found, for the most part, that these pages don't
concern
themselves with accessibility for the blind, the reasoning
apparently being
that a blind user would have no interest in or use for
graphic arts (a
position that I, of course, find questionable).
So I
guess my question is really two-fold: Am I being excessive in insisting
that
even a site that's predominantly visual in its purpose be accessible?
And
what are your recommendations for alt and long desc content in this
particular case?
Thanks much
Leslie
Leslie K. Yoder
lkyoder@pacbell.net