Re: CFC - WCAG 3 explainer and requirements

+1

Illai

On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 5:55 PM Brian Elton <belton@vispero.com> wrote:

> +1
>
>
>
> Brian
>
>
>
> *From:* Alastair Campbell <alastair.campbell@thisisgain.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, February 23, 2026 5:09 PM
> *To:* WCAG list <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> *Subject:* CFC - WCAG 3 explainer and requirements
> *Importance:* High
>
>
>
> CAUTION:EXTERNAL EMAIL SENDER!
>
>
>
> Call For Consensus — ends 2nd March 2026 at midday Boston time.
>
>
>
> The update is to publish updates to:
>
> ·             WCAG 3 explainer (https://w3c.github.io/wcag3/explainer/
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/w3c.github.io/wcag3/explainer/__;!!EDx7F7x-0XSOB8YS_BQ!dtF1XfBpH1cZfkKLBYd1KlbtWXkv6eLmjXNkEx988htp2ES_v0woMAss9aNomY2gJgeTjRbVW76u8uo$>
> ), and
>
> ·             WCAG 3 Requirements (
> https://w3c.github.io/wcag3/requirements/
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/w3c.github.io/wcag3/requirements/__;!!EDx7F7x-0XSOB8YS_BQ!dtF1XfBpH1cZfkKLBYd1KlbtWXkv6eLmjXNkEx988htp2ES_v0woMAss9aNomY2gJgeTjRbVoT8JM8U$>
> )
>
>
>
> This CFC does not replace the existing CFC for the working draft
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2026JanMar/0079.html__;!!EDx7F7x-0XSOB8YS_BQ!dtF1XfBpH1cZfkKLBYd1KlbtWXkv6eLmjXNkEx988htp2ES_v0woMAss9aNomY2gJgeTjRbVOeAwH5o$>
> .
>
>
>
> Updates to the explainer bring it in line with the current working draft
> for WCAG 3.
>
> Explainer diff
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https:**Awww.w3.org*TR*wcag-3.0-explainer*&doc2=https:**Adeploy-preview-585--wcag3.netlify.app*explainer*__;Ly8vLy8vLy8v!!EDx7F7x-0XSOB8YS_BQ!dtF1XfBpH1cZfkKLBYd1KlbtWXkv6eLmjXNkEx988htp2ES_v0woMAss9aNomY2gJgeTjRbVpFTDvX8$>
>
>
>
> Updates to the requirements were minimal to fix a broken link.
>
> Requirements diff
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https:**Awww.w3.org*TR*wcag-3.0-requirements*&doc2=https:**Adeploy-preview-585--wcag3.netlify.app*requirements*__;Ly8vLy8vLy8v!!EDx7F7x-0XSOB8YS_BQ!dtF1XfBpH1cZfkKLBYd1KlbtWXkv6eLmjXNkEx988htp2ES_v0woMAss9aNomY2gJgeTjRbVeDbQZl4$>
>
>
>
> To support the CFC please reply to the group with a “+1”.
>
>
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you not being
> able to accept this decision, please reply with a “-1” and explanation
> before the CfC deadline.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
> AG Chairs
>
>
>
>
>