Re: CFC - WCAG 3 explainer and requirements

-1 since internationalization (including the lack of I18N in WCAG 2) is not
mentioned.  Even the draft charter provides much more information about
I18N.

Regards,
MURATA Makoto

2026年2月24日(火) 7:10 Alastair Campbell <alastair.campbell@thisisgain.com>:

> Call For Consensus — ends 2nd March 2026 at midday Boston time.
>
> The update is to publish updates to:
>
>    - WCAG 3 explainer (https://w3c.github.io/wcag3/explainer/
>    <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://w3c.github.io/wcag3/explainer/__;!!EDx7F7x-0XSOB8YS_BQ!dtF1XfBpH1cZfkKLBYd1KlbtWXkv6eLmjXNkEx988htp2ES_v0woMAss9aNomY2gJgeTjRbVW76u8uo$>
>    ), and
>    - WCAG 3 Requirements (https://w3c.github.io/wcag3/requirements/
>    <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://w3c.github.io/wcag3/requirements/__;!!EDx7F7x-0XSOB8YS_BQ!dtF1XfBpH1cZfkKLBYd1KlbtWXkv6eLmjXNkEx988htp2ES_v0woMAss9aNomY2gJgeTjRbVoT8JM8U$>
>    )
>
>
> This CFC does not replace the existing CFC for the working draft
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2026JanMar/0079.html__;!!EDx7F7x-0XSOB8YS_BQ!dtF1XfBpH1cZfkKLBYd1KlbtWXkv6eLmjXNkEx988htp2ES_v0woMAss9aNomY2gJgeTjRbVOeAwH5o$>
> .
>
> Updates to the explainer bring it in line with the current working draft
> for WCAG 3.
> Explainer diff
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https:**Awww.w3.org*TR*wcag-3.0-explainer*&doc2=https:**Adeploy-preview-585--wcag3.netlify.app*explainer*__;Ly8vLy8vLy8v!!EDx7F7x-0XSOB8YS_BQ!dtF1XfBpH1cZfkKLBYd1KlbtWXkv6eLmjXNkEx988htp2ES_v0woMAss9aNomY2gJgeTjRbVpFTDvX8$>
>
> Updates to the requirements were minimal to fix a broken link.
> Requirements diff
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https:**Awww.w3.org*TR*wcag-3.0-requirements*&doc2=https:**Adeploy-preview-585--wcag3.netlify.app*requirements*__;Ly8vLy8vLy8v!!EDx7F7x-0XSOB8YS_BQ!dtF1XfBpH1cZfkKLBYd1KlbtWXkv6eLmjXNkEx988htp2ES_v0woMAss9aNomY2gJgeTjRbVeDbQZl4$>
>
> To support the CFC please reply to the group with a “+1”.
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you not being
> able to accept this decision, please reply with a “-1” and explanation
> before the CfC deadline.
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
> AG Chairs
>
>
>