Re: CFC - Publish new draft of WCAG-EM

Additional potential note for 4.3.3 Step 3.3: Include complete processes:

There are often cases where a process involves a long series of views 
that are essentially identical, such a series of views with nothing but 
a question with three radio options, yes / no / don't know and previous 
/ next links underneath. Other cases are quiz-type pages. For these, it 
seems redundant to include **all** steps in the process, so a note might 
qualify that if steps in a process are structurally identical, one view 
of a representative step can be sufficient.

Am 14.01.2026 um 17:42 schrieb Alastair Campbell:
>
> Call For Consensus — ends 21st January 2026 at midday Boston time.
>
> The request is to publish the draft of WCAG-EM 2.0 
> <https://w3c.github.io/wai-wcag-em/>.
> There is a Diff of the component markdown files 
> <https://github.com/w3c/wai-wcag-em/commit/0ec06bb41aeece3f4b533a85a12a845305700767>. 
> There is not a diff between the two final documents as the differences 
> in format would make it much harder to use.
>
> No issues were raised after the previous call in December. 
> <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2025OctDec/0075.html>
> To support the CFC please reply to the group with a “+1”.
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have 
> not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you 
> not being able to accept this decision, please reply with a “-1” and 
> explanation before the CfC deadline.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> -Alastair
>
> -- 
>
> Alastair Campbell
>
> *Director of Accessibility*
>
> E: _alastair.campbell@thisisgain.com_
>
> _<https://thisisgain.com/>_
>

-- 
Detlev Fischer PhD
IAAP Web Accessibility Specialist (WAS)
DIAS GmbH (Testkreis is now part of DIAS GmbH)

Telefon: +49-40-43 18 75-25
Mobil: +49-157 57 57 57 45
E-Mail:fischer@dias.de

http://www.dias.de
Beratung, Tests und Schulungen für barrierefreie Websites