This mapping shows where the WCAG 1.0 checkpoints appear in the 23 November 2005 Working Draft@@ April 2006 Last Call Working Draft. The WCAG 2.0 Working Draft is prepared by the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group (WCAG WG) to show how more generalized (less HTML-specific) WCAG checkpoints might read. The Working Draft is not based on consensus of the WCAG Working Group nor has it gone through W3C process. Guidelines and success criteria in the WCAG 2.0 Last Call Working Draft in no way supersede the checkpoints in WCAG 1.0.
The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group is working carefully to enable organizations and individuals that are currently using WCAG 1.0 (which remains stable and referenceable at this time) to ensure that they will eventually be able to make a smooth transition to WCAG 2.0.
Editorial Note: There are several issues and action items outstanding on this mapping.
In General (Priority 1) | WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria |
---|---|
1.1: Provide a text equivalent for every non-text element (e.g., via "alt", "longdesc", or in element content). This includes: images, graphical representations of text (including symbols), image map regions, animations (e.g., animated GIFs), applets and programmatic objects, ascii art, frames, scripts, images used as list bullets, spacers, graphical buttons, sounds (played with or without user interaction), stand-alone audio files, audio tracks of video, and video. |
For all non-text content, one of the following is true:
For scripts, applets and objects, alternative versions are covered under GL 4.2, and labels under GL 1.1. Images used as bullets are also covered in GL 1.3 with regard to CSS usage. For framesets, noframes is no longer required.For video, alternatives (beyond labels) are covered under GL 1.2. ASCII art is non-text content |
2.1: Ensure that all information conveyed with color is also available without color, for example from context or markup. |
When information is conveyed by color, the color can be programmatically determined or the information is also conveyed through another means that does not depend on the user's ability to differentiate colors. Any information that is conveyed by color is visually evident without color. |
4.1: Clearly identify changes in the natural language of a document's text and any text equivalents (e.g., captions). |
The natural language of each foreign passage or phrase in the content can be programmatically determined. SC 3.1.2 (level 2) The natural language of each passage or phrase in the Web unit can be programmatically determined. Note: identification of the language for individual words is no longer required. |
6.1: Organize documents so they may be read without style sheets. For example, when an HTML document is rendered without associated style sheets, it must still be possible to read the document. |
This is
|
6.2: Ensure that equivalents for dynamic content are updated when the dynamic content changes. | Text alternatives are addressed in
[add bug: need to figure out if alternatives changing when content changes needs to be made explicit (in WCAG 2.0)] |
7.1: Until user agents allow users to control flickering, avoid causing the screen to flicker. |
SC 2.3.2 (level 2): Content does not violate general flash threshold or red flash threshold. |
14.1: Use the clearest and simplest language appropriate for a site's content. |
Some of the |
And if you use images and image maps (Priority 1) | WCAG 2.0 Success Critera |
1.2: Provide redundant text links for each active region of a server-side image map. |
With regard to text alternatives:
For all non-text content, one of the following is true:
All functionality of the content is operable in a non time-dependent manner through a keyboard interface, except where the task requires analog, time-dependent input. Note: server-side image maps are not keyboard accessible. |
9.1: Provide client-side image maps instead of server-side image maps except where the regions cannot be defined with an available geometric shape. |
With regard to text alternatives:
For all non-text content, one of the following is true:
All functionality of the content is operable in a non time-dependent manner through a keyboard interface, except where the task requires analog, time-dependent input. Note: server-side image maps are not keyboard accessible. |
And if you use tables (Priority 1) | WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria |
5.1: For data tables, identify row and column headers. |
Perceivable structures within the content can be programmatically determined. Information and relationships conveyed through presentation can be programmatically determined and notification of changes to these is available to user agents, including assistive technologies. |
5.2: For data tables that have two or more logical levels of row or column headers, use markup to associate data cells and header cells. |
Perceivable structures within the content can be programmatically determined. Information and relationships conveyed through presentation can be programmatically determined and notification of changes to these is available to user agents, including assistive technologies. |
And if you use frames (Priority 1) | WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria |
12.1: Title each frame to facilitate frame identification and navigation. |
Navigational features within the content can be programmatically determined. For all user interface components, the name and role can be programmatically determined, values that can be set by the user can be programmatically set, and notification of changes to these items is available to user agents, including assistive technologies.@@debatable mapping? OK if frames can be considered user interface components. However, 'Using the title attribute of the frame element' only maps to Level 2 success criteria in 2.4. |
And if you use applets and scripts (Priority 1) | WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria |
6.3: Ensure that pages are usable when scripts, applets, or other programmatic objects are turned off or not supported. If this is not possible, provide equivalent information on an alternative accessible page. |
For any technologies (scripts, applets, or other programmatic objects) not in the specified baseline, the following are true:
|
And if you use multimedia (Priority 1) | WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria |
1.3: Until user agents can automatically read aloud the text equivalent of a visual track, provide an auditory description of the important information of the visual track of a multimedia presentation. |
Audio descriptions of video are provided for prerecorded multimedia Audio descriptions of video or a full multimedia text alternative including any interaction, are provided for prerecorded multimedia. |
1.4: For any time-based multimedia presentation (e.g., a movie or animation), synchronize equivalent alternatives (e.g., captions or auditory descriptions of the visual track) with the presentation. |
Captions are provided for prerecorded multimedia. Audio descriptions of video are provided for prerecorded multimedia Audio descriptions of video or a full multimedia text alternative including any interaction, are provided for prerecorded multimedia. |
And if all else fails (Priority 1) | WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria |
11.4: If, after best efforts, you cannot create an accessible page, provide a link to an alternative page that uses W3C technologies, is accessible, has equivalent information (or functionality), and is updated as often as the inaccessible (original) page. |
|
In General (Priority 2) | WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria |
---|---|
2.2: Ensure that foreground and background color combinations provide sufficient contrast when viewed by someone having color deficits or when viewed on a black and white screen. [Priority 2 for images, Priority 3 for text]. |
Text or diagrams, and their background, Text or diagrams, and their background, |
3.1: When an appropriate markup language exists, use markup rather than images to convey information. | GL 1.3 Advisory Note: There is no optional technique for this in |
3.2: Create documents that validate to published formal grammars. | Note: Validating to published formal grammars is a stronger requirement than unambiguous parsing and is an |
3.3: Use style sheets to control layout and presentation. |
Maps to several items in |
3.4: Use relative rather than absolute units in markup language attribute values and style sheet property values. | Note: action item to explore whether there should or shouldn't be a SC about scaling of fonts and other presentational elements. [Nothing about relative or absolute units in Understanding WCAG 2.0.] |
3.5 Use header elements to convey document structure and use them according to specification. |
Perceivable structures within the content can be programmatically determined. Information and relationships conveyed through presentation can be programmatically determined and notification of changes to these is available to user agents, including assistive technologies. |
3.6: Mark up lists and list items properly. |
Perceivable structures within the content can be programmatically determined. Information and relationships conveyed through presentation can be programmatically determined and notification of changes to these is available to user agents, including assistive technologies. |
3.7: Mark up quotations. Do not use quotation markup for formatting effects such as indentation. |
Perceivable structures within the content can be programmatically determined. Information and relationships conveyed through presentation can be programmatically determined and notification of changes to these is available to user agents, including assistive technologies. |
6.5: Ensure that dynamic content is accessible or provide an alternative presentation or page. |
|
7.2: Until user agents allow users to control blinking, avoid causing content to blink (i.e., change presentation at a regular rate, such as turning on and off). |
Content does not blink for more than |
7.4: Until user agents provide the ability to stop the refresh, do not create periodically auto-refreshing pages. |
For each time-out that is a function of the content, at least one of the following is true:
Changes of context are initiated only by user request. |
7.5: Until user agents provide the ability to stop auto-redirect, do not use markup to redirect pages automatically. Instead, configure the server to perform redirects. |
Changes of context are initiated only by user request. |
10.1: Until user agents allow users to turn off spawned windows, do not cause pop-ups or other windows to appear and do not change the current window without informing the user. |
When any component receives focus, it does not cause a change of context. Changes of context are initiated only by user request. |
11.1: Use W3C technologies when they are available and appropriate for a task and use the latest versions when supported. |
No longer required for conformance to WCAG 2.0. Note: |
11.2: Avoid deprecated features of W3C technologies. | |
12.3: Divide large blocks of information into more manageable groups where natural and appropriate. |
No longer required for conformance to WCAG 2.0. This checkpoint can map to advisory information for GL 3.1 in Understanding WCAG 2.0 (good practice that is encouraged as appropriate). No technique for this seems to exist; Ordering the content in a meaningful sequence addresses something very different. Using h1-h6 to identify headings (for 1.3.1) comes close but does not match well enough. @TODO create optional technique. |
13.1: Clearly identify the target of each link. |
SC 2.4.8 (level 3): The purpose of each link can be programmatically determined from the link. |
13.2: Provide metadata to add semantic information to pages and sites. | This is no longer required for conformance, but could be a technique for satisfying certain success criteria in Guidelines 2.4, 4.2, or 1.3. There are proposals for techniques with metadata for 3.1.5 (supplements), Using the link element and navigation tools (for 2.4.2); no relevant techniques yet for 4.2. |
13.3: Provide information about the general layout of a site (e.g., a site map or table of contents). |
More than one way is available to locate content within a set of Information about the user's location within a set of Might also map to an advisory item. No technique for this available. @todo create technique? Note: this is a partial mapping. |
13.4: Use navigation mechanisms in a consistent manner. |
3. 4. Components that have the same functionality |
And if you use tables (Priority 2) | WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria |
5.3: Do not use tables for layout unless the table makes sense when linearized. Otherwise, if the table does not make sense, provide an alternative equivalent (which may be a linearized version). |
|
5.4: If a table is used for layout, do not use any structural markup for the purpose of visual formatting. | SC 1.3.1 (level 1): Information and relationships conveyed through presentation can be programmatically determined and notification of changes to these is available to user agents, including assistive technologies. Especially:Failure due to using structural markup in a way that does not represent relationships in the content.@@exact URL in Understanding... |
And if you use frames (Priority 2) | WCAG 2.0 Succes Criteria |
12.2: Describe the purpose of frames and how frames relate to each other if it is not obvious by frame titles alone. |
This is no longer required for conformance (because the longdesc attribute type on the frame element type
has not been supported and is longdesc attribute is still present in the Frames Module defined in XHTML Modularization.
|
And if you use forms (Priority 2) | WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria |
10.2: Until user agents support explicit associations between labels and form controls, for all form controls with implicitly associated labels, ensure that the label is properly positioned. | Advisory item in Understanding WCAG 2.0. Note: this mapping may change if a Success Criterion related to the positioning of labels is created (see action item 1 September 2005). No Success Criterion has been created for this (proposal rejected?); no technique is available. |
12.4: Associate labels explicitly with their controls. |
The label of each user interface control that accepts input from the user can be programmatically determined and is explicitly associated with the control. For all user interface components, the name and role can be programmatically determined, values that can be set by the user can be programmatically set, and notification of changes to these items is available to user agents, including assistive technologies. |
And if you use applets and scripts (Priority 2) | WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria |
6.4: For scripts and applets, ensure that event handlers are input device-independent. |
All functionality of the content is operable in a non time-dependent manner through a keyboard interface, except where the task requires analog, time-dependent input. Note: device-independent event handlers are not explicitly required. |
7.3: Until user agents allow users to freeze moving content, avoid movement in pages. |
Content can be paused by the user unless the timing or movement is part of an activity where timing or movement is essential. Note: The "until user agents" clause has been satisfied, so it is no longer necessary to avoid movement altogether, as long as authors don't do anything to interfere with the user's ability to pause the content. @todo: update User Agent Support for Accessibility with this info? |
8.1: Make programmatic elements such as scripts and applets directly accessible or compatible with assistive technologies [Priority 1 if functionality is important and not presented elsewhere, otherwise Priority 2.] |
|
9.2: Ensure that any element that has its own interface can be operated in a device-independent manner. |
All functionality of the content is operable in a non time-dependent manner through a keyboard interface, except where the task requires analog, time-dependent input. |
9.3: For scripts, specify logical event handlers rather than device-dependent event handlers. |
All functionality of the content is operable in a non time-dependent manner through a keyboard interface, except where the task requires analog, time-dependent input. |
In General (Priority 3) | WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria |
---|---|
4.2: Specify the expansion of each abbreviation or acronym in a document where it first occurs. |
A mechanism for finding the expanded form of abbreviations is available. |
4.3: Identify the primary natural language of a document. |
The primary natural language or languages of the |
9.4: Create a logical tab order through links, form controls, and objects. |
When a |
9.5: Provide keyboard shortcuts to important links (including those in client-side image maps), form controls, and groups of form controls. |
Advisory item in Understanding WCAG 2.0: Providing access keys (optional technique for SC 2.4.1 (level 1)). Providing keyboard access to important links and form controls is empty..@@exact URL in Understanding... Note: accesskeys are no longer required for conformance to WCAG 2.0. |
10.5: Until user agents (including assistive technologies) render adjacent links distinctly, include non-link, printable characters (surrounded by spaces) between adjacent links. |
Advisory item in Guide Document. No matching technique or failure. Note: this technique is no longer needed for user agents but may be useful for people with cognitive disabilities. |
11.3: Provide information so that users may receive documents according to their preferences (e.g., language, content type, etc.) | This checkpoint does not map to any WCAG 2.0 success criterion, though certain aspects may map to certain success criteria or to advisory items in a Understanding WCAG 2.0. No matching technique or failure. |
13.5: Provide navigation bars to highlight and give access to the navigation mechanism. |
This checkpoint is not required by any success criterion in WCAG 2.0.
It is a possible strategy to address |
13.6: Group related links, identify the group (for user agents), and, until user agents do so, provide a way to bypass the group. |
Note: In WCAG 2.0 it only relates to groups that are repeated on multiple delivery units. |
13.7: If search functions are provided, enable different types of searches for different skill levels and preferences. | Note: This checkpoint does not directly map to any WCAG 2.0 Success Criterion and is not required. Some aspects relate to 2.4.2 (level 2) and 2.5.4 (level 3) as well as advisory items in Understanding WCAG 2.0. |
13.8: Place distinguishing information at the beginning of headings, paragraphs, lists, etc. | This checkpoint is not required by any Success Criterion in WCAG 2.0. It may be useful to map it to advisory items in Understanding WCAG 2.0. Part of this maps to an optional technique for SC 2.4.5 (level 3). Starting section headings with unique information is only a draft. |
13.9: Provide information about document collections (i.e., documents comprising multiple pages.) |
This checkpoint is not in WCAG 2.0 but does relate to |
13.10: Provide a means to skip over multi-line ASCII art. | This technique is not required by any Success Criterion in WCAG 2.0. ASCII art is considered non-text content and would map to an advisory item in Understanding WCAG 2.0.No techniques or failures about ASCII art. |
14.2: Supplement text with graphic or auditory presentations where they will facilitate comprehension of the page. |
This checkpoint is not required by any WCAG 2.0 Success Criterion.
It is a strategy that can be used to address WCAG 2.0 |
14.3: Create a style of presentation that is consistent across pages. |
Aspects of WCAG 1.0 Checkpoint 14.3 are required by WCAG 2.0 Guideline
|
And if you use images and image maps (Priority 3) | WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria |
1.5: Until user agents render text equivalents for client-side image map links, provide redundant text links for each active region of a client-side image map. |
WCAG 1.0 Checkpoint 1.5 is not required by any Success Criterion in WCAG 2.0.
It might appear as a repair technique in conjunction with an advisory item in Understanding WCAG 2.0.
Note: this is no longer required because of advances in user agents. @todo: update User Agent Support for Accessibility? |
And if you use tables (Priority 3) | WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria |
5.5: Provide summaries for tables. | This is no longer required for conformance. However, in layout tables, the summary attribute must be omitted or empty. See Failure due to using th elements, caption elements, or non-empty summary attributes in layout tables for 1.3.1.@@exact URL in Understanding... |
5.6: Provide abbreviations for header labels. | This is no longer required for conformance, but a potentially useful technique.No matching techniques. |
10.3: Until user agents (including assistive technologies) render side-by-side text correctly, provide a linear text alternative (on the current page or some other) for all tables that lay out text in parallel, word-wrapped columns. | WCAG 1.0 Checkpoint 10.3 is no longer required for conformance to WCAG 2.0. |
And if you use forms (Priority 3) | WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria |
10.4 Until user agents handle empty controls correctly, include default, place-holding characters in edit boxes and text areas. | Deprecate. [Was "deprecated" understood in the way defined in the 4 August teleconference? If not, it should be "not required".]No matching failure or other info. |