Guide to Guideline 3.1 Level 1 Success Criterion 1 (proposed)

Major sections of this page

  • Understanding Guideline 3.1 L1 SC1

  • Techniques for meeting Guideline 3.1 L1 SC1

  • Benefits and Examples of Guideline 3.1 L1 SC1

    What WCAG 2.0 requires

    1. A mechanism is available to identify the natural language or languages of the delivery unit.

    Note: This success criterion is in DRAFT form. It is presented to the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group as a formal proposal, but it has not earned the consensus of the Working Group, and it does not appear in the current Public Working Draft at http://www.w3.org/tr/wcag20. It is presented here for discussion only. It must not be cited as a normative reference.

    Understanding Guideline 3.1 L1 SC1

    Key terms and important concepts

    Natural language

    Natural languages are those used by humans to communicate, including spoken, written, and signed languages.

    Primary language

    The primary language is the language of the delivery unit as a whole. The W3C’s Internationalization Working Group suggests that it is helpful to think of the primary language as the language used by the intended audience of the delivery unit.

    Intended audience

    The people for whom the Web site, application, or other resource has been created. The audience may be large or small, local or global. The intended audience may be deeply knowledgeable about the topic, or completely uninformed.

    Text-processing language

    The text-processing language is the language in which a specific range of text is actually written. Screen readers and visual browsers, as well as other user agents, can present text correctly when the text-processing language is identified.

    Intent of this success criterion

    The intent of this success criterion is to ensure that user agents present text and other linguistic content correctly.

    both assistive technologies and conventional user agents can render text more accurately when the language of the delivery unit is identified. Screen readers can load the correct pronunciation rules. Visual browsers can display characters and scripts correctly. Media players can show captions correctly. As a result, users with disabilities will be better able to understand the content.

    Applicability: When does Guideline 3.1 L1 SC1 Apply?

    This success criterion applies to all delivery units.

    Note: The ISO 639 standard lists codes to represent approximately 400 languages. This is a large number. However, there are approximately 6,000 languages in the world today. Twelve of these languages have more than 100 million speakers each, accounting for just over half of the world’s population. But most languages are spoken by small groups of people: 4 per cent of the world population accounts for over 90 per cent of the world’s languages. And more than half of the languages that exist today are in danger of being lost. To complicate matters still more, today’s screen readers support a combined total of only about 20 languages. This means that millions of people who are blind do not have access to Web content in their own languages, even when others who speak those languages do have access. There are similar problems for people who are Deaf, deaf-blind, or hard of hearing.

    How should we deal with languages for which there is no language code? According to UNESCO, “90% of the world?s languages are not represented on the Internet.” See http://portal.unesco.org/culture/en/ev.php-URL_ID=8270&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html.

    RFC 3066 defines a procedure for registering new language codes, and Unicode has procedures for creating new character-sets, etc. Does this mean that content can conform if the authors register a language code and create a Unicode character-set ? Does it mean that content cannot conform if it’s written in a language for which there is no language code and no Unicode character-set?]

    Techniques for meeting Guideline 3.1 L1 SC1

    Technology-Independent techniques for Guideline 3.1 L1 SC1

    The W3C’s Internationalization Working Group recommends following the method described in RFC 3066. This RFC in turn relies on the ISO 639 standard list of Codes for the Representation of Language Names, usually referred to as ISO 639.

    Use the two-letter codes defined by the ISO 639 standard to identify the language of the delivery unit. (ISO 639-2 defines a number of three-letter codes, but the W3C’s Internationalization Working Group recommends using the two-letter codes whenever these are available.)

    There are also country codes, which are defined in ISO standard 3166. These may be used together with the primary language tag to identify national or regional variants of a language.

    Technology-Specific Techniques for Guideline 3.1 L1 SC1

    HTML techniques

    CSS Techniques

    Advisory techniques: going beyond Guideline 3.1 L1 SC1

    Benefits and Examples

    Benefits: How Guideline 3.1 L1 SC1 Helps People with Disabilities

    This success criterion helps:

    Examples of Guideline 3.1 L1 SC1

    Related resources