Change log: Planning a Web Accessibility Training - ASSESMENT F0R CA MEETING
KEY:
* DO NO HARM
** DUSTING OFF
*** QUESTIONS ABOUT
**** GEMS
X - TOO MUCH TIME, TOO COMPLICATED, ETC.
Change requests from 24 March 2002
- brainstorming about tutorials & templates [X
- LONG TERM LOOK-SUGGEST REVIEW/CREATE UPDATED WISH LIST THAT IS 1) UNDERSTANDABLE
AFTER LONG ABSENSE, 2) ELIMINATES ITEMS, 3) REFRAIN FROM ADDING NEW ITEMS
FOR NOW]
- wcag techniques -- being updated, modular, able to be linked to [**DUSTING
OFF]
- mock up page w/ explanation behind it [X
- COMPLICATED ISSUE]
- page of links w/ short info that goes out to different types of info,
plug and play examples, best practices examples, etc., [X
- TIME CONSUMING]
- drop in on a faq, w/ buttons saying "simpler" or "more technical"
-- allows them to adjust the level of answer they are looking for [X
- NEEDS DISCUSSION]
- if all in central database, can draw out, easier to maintain [**SOUNDS
LIKE A "WHY" ITEM]
- include ud perspective somewhere
- think about what can link to from html document as well, multiple
means of navigation [**DUSTING OFF]
- think how designers think, especially when they are just getting
started [X - NEEDS
DISCUSSION]
- help developers figure out how to use their own tools accessibly
[X - COMPLICATED
ISSUE]
- extract summaries as a start [***FROM WHERE?]
- ensure peer review of the materials [**SOUNDS
LIKE A "WHAT" ITEM]
- think about how to link to external materials that relate to our
goals [X - COMPLICATED
ISSUE]
- template=fish, implementations of accessible code; tutorial=how to
fish
- having a way to sort the material to better match the intent of the
user X - [USER-CENTERED
DESIGN DISCUSSION]
- eowg: keep figure out how to help people find the right info &
tools, better examine the user needs, [X
- USER-CENTERED DESIGN DISCUSSION]
- [ertwg dev aert, going on more in wcag now... so we also need to
look at getting people to the eval resources] [X
- NEEDS DISCUSSION]
- [tutorials great idea, can be done little piece by little piece]
[**COMMENT ON APPROACH]
- [look at examples on ibm site, think about blank templates, useful]
[X - NEEDS
DISCUSSION]
- templates mainly addressing the issue of navigability and orientation...
does not make it comprehensible for people... perceivability not well
reflected... [X -
NEEDS DISCUSSION]
- think about the audiences of whole-page templates as including those
who commission the design...contextual examples can do that... [X
- NEEDS DISCUSSION]
- template: eowg should name the fish. [**COMMENT
ON APPROACH]
- plug and play page (less important)
- page that drives delivery of content (industry's resp)
- general guideline for critical formating (explanation) (eowg)
- eowg operating as requ gathering arm, wcag how to arm..... [***WHAT
IS THIS?]
- template: a framework into which you plug code, vs sample code, what
you plug in
- don't hijack words, doesn't work [**DUSTING
OFF]
- existence proofs, important to have [***WHAT
IS THIS?]
- ...bobby learning tool... eowg should look at it [***TO
WHAT PURPOSE?]
-
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/training/ra.html
- broaden up the impact in #1, aging, etc., device independence, electric
fences etc. [OR and its impact on everyone including pwd]: start w/
clear focus on people w/ disabilities -- and then expand it to include
aging etc., and carry-over benefits to other situations. [**DUSTING
OFF]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/training/ra
- #4designing: update links to WCAG modules [LP & AG looking at
those resources to compare against the newer modules] [**DUSTING
OFF]
- #4designing: replace link to selecting software [**DUSTING
OFF]
- #5evaluating: point to how to evaluate for web accessibility, separate
pointers to prelim & comprehensive [**DUSTING
OFF]
- consider adding in intros & advanced -- let people decide --
hurdle? red flag? (text) [***WHAT DOES THI MEAN?]
- tutorial
modules wishlist.... what if we made little tutorial modules about the
most intractable design problems, take a design problem from top to toe
(these are ideas generated from EOWG discussion 02/22): [*****GEMS???
- JUSTIN & VINCENT?]
- how to design tabbed-like navigation
- how to design client-side image maps
- how to design drop-down list box menus
- how to design cascading or fly-out menus
- how to design multicolumn layouts
- how to design frame alternatives
- how to design effective cross-platform css-based page layout
[MUCH NEEDED!!!!!]
- alt text demystified
- how to design data tables with navigation aids
- mathml in design
- how to set up keyboard shortcuts or to expose standards
- specifying page measurements
- setting up an accessible forms & communicating on validations
errors
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/training/ra
- really important to get the web page & digital format of WSTW up
& electronically available *during first quarter 2002* [***WHAT
IS WSTW?]
- and to edit out the inaccurate table part in WSTW [*DONE?
- NO TABLE/TABLE CODE]
- update the mention of pwwebspeak if possible [***IS
THIS A CURRENT TECHNOLOGY?]
- update the overview of wai & make sure links to individual slides
still work [**DUSTING OFF]
- add (self, friends, relatives) to prior experience qu
- consider linking to Trace resource on Web accessibility navigation
w/ Neal Ewers, and/or negotiating for co-hosting other demonstration that
would be relevant [*DO
NO HARM?]
- check out anamolous text decoration colors on links [*DO
NO HARM?]
- link to aux benefits... [*DO
NO HARM?]
- add in a discussion question under business case: "do you use pda's,
do you access the internet through wireless technologies, how do you think
it can be applicable?" (and link to explanation of why!!) [**DUSTING
OFF]
- add in discussion question, "are you trying to reach audiences w/ low
literacy and/or second language access needs" (and link to explanation
of why!!) [**DUSTING OFF]
- add link to selecting and using using authoring tools [**DUSTING
OFF]
- check techniques links [**DUSTING OFF]
- LATER: add link to before & after under "designing" [***WHAT
KIND OF LINK & WHY]
- LATER: add lnk to demographics [***DO THESE EXIST?]
- #2, link to preliminary review. [*DO NO HARM?]
Last updated 30 January, 2002 by Judy Brewer
(jbrewer@w3.org)