July 16 Minutes

WL
GR
JR
HS
MK
CMN

Issues:

1. Wombat draft revisions and additions

Is the new working draft ready to send to IG: Yes: RESOLVED

JT: Do we want to address editorial notes on the call?

CMN: Would rather not.

HS: Wants some more time to look at the at minimums.

Jutta goes through the open issues in the working drafts.

ACTION ITEM: Jan will look at which WCAG checkpoints apply in 3.1.

ACTION ITEM: Charles will look at which WCAG checkpoints apply in 3.2.

JT: What should we do about a minimum for 7.1.

HS: Maybe point to legislation?

CMN: Many laws in other countries point to us.

CMN: Will probably end up pointing to Platform standards and UA.

JT: Would like to do a simple synthesis of common requirements.

JR: This is good as long as week keep it at a high functional level.

CMN: ok, that stuff is already in the techniques

ACTION ITEM: JT will send a similar synthesis being made for IMS to the list.

WL: Wants next, prev, sibling, parent, child

ACTION ITEM: CMN will compose an at minimum statement and a technique for 7.5

JT: Waht about 2.1?

JR: rec + 2 times the average dev cycle

2. Evaluation commitments

3. Other