JR: Jan Richards
JT: Jutta Treviranus
PJ: Phill Jenkins
FB: Fred Barnett
WL: William Loughborough
LG: Lou Gerard
LM: Lisa Molden
MK: Marjolein Katsma
CMN:

CMN gives regrets.

CMN: Our group should produce some ideas about how to make interfaces.

JT: Or at least how to build an authoring tool UI

JT: We have requested meetings with a bunch of W3 groups?  Do people have questions for them?

PJ: Have them think of scenarios that apply to authoring their markup language, etc.  Then we can think about how to make it accessible.

JT: Might be a problem for large areas like SMIL.

CMN: Important to at least get each group to think about accessibility and will expose us to experience with different kinds of authoring scenarios.

Lisa: Very similar to the way that MS accessibility team is set up.

JT: So we should make sure to emphasize auth. scen. in our contact with the groups.

JT: Other issues?

WL: If device independence activity has started we may want to point out to them that we are concerned with DI at both ends.

WL, CMN, JT, PJ: Discussion of the role of the DI activity.

JT: The jist of the request to meet jointly will say we want to discuss authoring scearios and how they effect both sides.

PJ: Example, what templates can they provide. Maybe it would be good to get authoring scenarios beforehand.

JT: OK I will put it in request.

PJ: Authoring scenarios would be helpful to get in general from the different groups.

JT: OK, anyone else?

PJ: Is DOM included?

JT: DOM may not be meeting. I will check.

JT: Next item.  UA group has asked us to review their last call document.

PJ: Already reviewing for IBM but will look for AU issues as well.

WL: Will also read it for AU.

JT: On behalf of the group we need to submit our comments.

JT: Next issue: AERT integration.

JT: Should it be integrated as one piece or split up.

JR: Action item: Will check the AERT for things for the ATAG techniques.

JT, PJ, JR: Clarification of the WCAG-ATAG split of AERT.

JR: Lots of stuff about new structure of ATAG techs.

WL: We should base techniques on WCAG 2.0.

JT: Action Item get back to the list about the possibility of basing AU techs on WCAG 2.0.

CMN drops out.